On 25/05/2014 04:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:05:34PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 23 14:40, Jon TURNEY wrote:
Not sure if this is wanted, and it obviously has some knock on effects on
package and snapshot generation.
But, cygport names detached debug info
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 04:05:34PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On May 23 14:40, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>
>> Not sure if this is wanted, and it obviously has some knock on effects on
>> package and snapshot generation.
>>
>> But, cygport names detached debug info files by appending the .dbg suffix
On May 23 14:40, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>
> Not sure if this is wanted, and it obviously has some knock on effects on
> package and snapshot generation.
>
> But, cygport names detached debug info files by appending the .dbg suffix.
> This is 'obviously correct' as it means that both a foo.exe and foo.
Not sure if this is wanted, and it obviously has some knock on effects
on package and snapshot generation.
But, cygport names detached debug info files by appending the .dbg
suffix. This is 'obviously correct' as it means that both a foo.exe and
foo.dll can exist and have detached debug inf
