--- Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> >
> > -z, --version output version information and exit
> >
> > I used -z since -v is --verbose. It could also have no character
> > option if that would be better.
>
> Why not -V?
No no no. Makes much too muc
--- Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> >
> > -z, --version output version information and exit
> >
> > I used -z since -v is --verbose. It could also have no character
> > option if that would be better.
>
> Why not -V?
No no no. Makes much too mu
--- Warren Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> >
> > -z, --version output version information and exit
> >
> > I used -z since -v is --verbose. It could also have no character
> > option if that would be better.
>
> Why not -V?
No no no. Makes much too mu
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>
> -z, --version output version information and exit
>
> I used -z since -v is --verbose. It could also have no character
> option if that would be better.
Why not -V?
>The usual thing to do for versions is to get the CVS version number and
>apply that.
I'm assuming that lines like this in CVS/Entries give the version numbers:
/cygcheck.cc/1.22/Tue Jan 29 03:08:42 2002/-ko/
/cygpath.cc/1.13/Thu Jan 17 16:54:01 2002/-ko/
/dump_setup.cc/1.4/Tue Jan 29 18:37:00 2
The usual thing to do for versions is to get the CVS version number and
apply that.
Rob
