Charles Wilson wrote:
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> If you're feeling motivated, mkfifo() still needs implimenting ;-).
IIRC, fifo operation needs the cygwin daemon. No sense in implementing
mkfifo() if the fifo itself doesn't work. Whatever happened to the
daemon work? conrad, oh con-rad...
A
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
> If you're feeling motivated, mkfifo() still needs implimenting ;-).
IIRC, fifo operation needs the cygwin daemon. No sense in implementing
mkfifo() if the fifo itself doesn't work. Whatever happened to the
daemon work? conrad, oh con-rad...
As cgf asked on 11/4: "St
So... Do it!-)
Sergey Okhapkin
Somerset, NJ
- Original Message -
From: "Nicholas Wourms" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Sergey Okhapkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Cygwin-Patches" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2002 2:43 PM
Subje
Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
The patch fixes a problem with a characters loss on select on a serial port.
I wonder what PurgeComm() calls in the original code supposed to do...
If you're feeling motivated, mkfifo() still needs
implimenting ;-).
Cheers,
Nicholas
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 01:47:48PM -0500, Sergey Okhapkin wrote:
>The patch fixes a problem with a characters loss on select on a serial port.
>I wonder what PurgeComm() calls in the original code supposed to do...
Dunno. I probably wrote the code, too.
>2002-11-15 Sergey Okhapkin <[EMAIL PROT
