On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:18:35PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Anyway, since I now understand the reason for the above mentioned
>change, I've checked it in. Now on to the rest of your patch...
I've checked this in with some minor modifications. Namely, I changed
the name of _DELAY_MAX to
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 10:18:35PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>Merely
>stating that something is basically a challenge to go try to recreate
^
is changed
>your thought process.
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 09:40:17PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>This is part 1 of the patch I sent yesterday.
>See previous mails for background info.
>Here are some more details:
>
>hires_ms::minperiodMake NO_COPY for per process initialization.
>hires_ms::resolution For use in sleep an
