On Apr 10 14:34, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On 4/10/19 2:32 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> > On 4/10/19 11:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Apr 9 11:23, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> >>> Some distros prefer a POSIX shell other than /bin/ash and /bin/dash.
> >>
> >> I think this is p
On 4/10/19 2:32 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> On 4/10/19 11:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Apr 9 11:23, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>>> Some distros prefer a POSIX shell other than /bin/ash and /bin/dash.
>>
>> I think this is pretty old stuff nobody really looked at for a while.
>> as
On 4/10/19 11:02 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Apr 9 11:23, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
>> Some distros prefer a POSIX shell other than /bin/ash and /bin/dash.
>
> I think this is pretty old stuff nobody really looked at for a while.
> ash and dash are the same binary anyway, both are dash.
On Apr 9 11:23, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Some distros prefer a POSIX shell other than /bin/ash and /bin/dash.
I think this is pretty old stuff nobody really looked at for a while.
ash and dash are the same binary anyway, both are dash.
I'd prefer to drop the distinction between ash and das
