On Aug 27 20:00, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 8/27/2019 4:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Aug 26 17:43, Ken Brown wrote:
> >> Don't refer to lacl[pos] unless we know that pos >= 0.
> >
> > I'm not sure this is entirely right. Moving the assignment to
> > class_perm/def_class_perm into the previous
On 8/27/2019 4:13 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Aug 26 17:43, Ken Brown wrote:
>> Don't refer to lacl[pos] unless we know that pos >= 0.
>
> I'm not sure this is entirely right. Moving the assignment to
> class_perm/def_class_perm into the previous if makes sense, but the
> bools has_class_per
Hi Ken,
On Aug 26 17:43, Ken Brown wrote:
> Don't refer to lacl[pos] unless we know that pos >= 0.
I'm not sure this is entirely right. Moving the assignment to
class_perm/def_class_perm into the previous if makes sense, but the
bools has_class_perm and has_def_class_perm should be set no matter
