Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Gary R Van Sickle wrote: > What am I missing here? Beep (412, 100) ==> MessageBeep > ((unsigned)-1) and we're done, right? No need for any CYGWIN= > hoobajoob or another static BOOL or anything. Checking MSDN "If the sound card is not available, the sound is generated using the speaker." So

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 06:45:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:40:13PM -0600, Gary R Van Sickle wrote: >>What am I missing here? Beep (412, 100) ==> MessageBeep ((unsigned)-1) and >>we're done, right? No need for any CYGWIN= hoobajoob or another static BOOL >>or a

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:40:13PM -0600, Gary R Van Sickle wrote: >What am I missing here? Beep (412, 100) ==> MessageBeep ((unsigned)-1) and >we're done, right? No need for any CYGWIN= hoobajoob or another static BOOL >or anything. Will that work right on PCs without a soundcard? If so, when

RE: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Gary R Van Sickle
What am I missing here? Beep (412, 100) ==> MessageBeep ((unsigned)-1) and we're done, right? No need for any CYGWIN= hoobajoob or another static BOOL or anything. -- Gary R. Van Sickle Braemar Inc. 11481 Rupp Dr. Burnsville, MN 55337 > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:32:47PM -, Max Bowsher wrot

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:32:47PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >> I don't like to introduce lots of unnecessary decision points into a >> product. It increases support and it increases code complexity. > >Complexity? Slightly, but only at CYGWIN-parsing time, and Beeping time. >That's not that much,

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:39:21PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >> Christopher Faylor wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote: Hi, this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using soundcard by MessageBeep() c

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Vaclav Haisman
> I don't like to introduce lots of unnecessary decision points into a > product. It increases support and it increases code complexity. This patch is literally few lines long. I doubt it adds much complexity. > > Once again, how does linux handle this scenario? You don't do a > "export LINUX=lin

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:39:21PM -, Max Bowsher wrote: >Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using >>> soundcard by MessageBeep() call. It can be enabled by new CYGWI

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Max Bowsher
Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote: >> >> Hi, >> this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using >> soundcard by MessageBeep() call. It can be enabled by new CYGWIN >> option winbeep. >> >> Vaclav Haisman >> >> 2003-02-13 Vaclav

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote: > >Hi, >this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using soundcard by >MessageBeep() call. It can be enabled by new CYGWIN option winbeep. > >Vaclav Haisman > >2003-02-13 Vaclav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * envir

Re: Produce beeps using soundcard

2003-02-13 Thread Joshua Daniel Franklin
>From 'man bash': escape sequences, if present, are decoded as follows: \a alert (bell) Wouldn't this be better called "bell" or "alert"? --- Vaclav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using soundcard by > M