Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
> What am I missing here? Beep (412, 100) ==> MessageBeep
> ((unsigned)-1) and we're done, right? No need for any CYGWIN=
> hoobajoob or another static BOOL or anything.
Checking MSDN
"If the sound card is not available, the sound is generated using the
speaker."
So
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 06:45:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:40:13PM -0600, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
>>What am I missing here? Beep (412, 100) ==> MessageBeep ((unsigned)-1) and
>>we're done, right? No need for any CYGWIN= hoobajoob or another static BOOL
>>or a
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:40:13PM -0600, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
>What am I missing here? Beep (412, 100) ==> MessageBeep ((unsigned)-1) and
>we're done, right? No need for any CYGWIN= hoobajoob or another static BOOL
>or anything.
Will that work right on PCs without a soundcard? If so, when
What am I missing here? Beep (412, 100) ==> MessageBeep ((unsigned)-1) and
we're done, right? No need for any CYGWIN= hoobajoob or another static BOOL
or anything.
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Braemar Inc.
11481 Rupp Dr.
Burnsville, MN 55337
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:32:47PM -, Max Bowsher wrot
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:32:47PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> I don't like to introduce lots of unnecessary decision points into a
>> product. It increases support and it increases code complexity.
>
>Complexity? Slightly, but only at CYGWIN-parsing time, and Beeping time.
>That's not that much,
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:39:21PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
Hi,
this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using
soundcard by MessageBeep() c
> I don't like to introduce lots of unnecessary decision points into a
> product. It increases support and it increases code complexity.
This patch is literally few lines long. I doubt it adds much complexity.
>
> Once again, how does linux handle this scenario? You don't do a
> "export LINUX=lin
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:39:21PM -, Max Bowsher wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>> this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using
>>> soundcard by MessageBeep() call. It can be enabled by new CYGWI
Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>> this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using
>> soundcard by MessageBeep() call. It can be enabled by new CYGWIN
>> option winbeep.
>>
>> Vaclav Haisman
>>
>> 2003-02-13 Vaclav
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 01:34:28AM +0100, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
>
>Hi,
>this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using soundcard by
>MessageBeep() call. It can be enabled by new CYGWIN option winbeep.
>
>Vaclav Haisman
>
>2003-02-13 Vaclav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> * envir
>From 'man bash':
escape sequences, if present, are decoded as follows:
\a alert (bell)
Wouldn't this be better called "bell" or "alert"?
--- Vaclav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using soundcard by
> M
Hi,
this small patch adds an ability to produce beeps (\a) using soundcard by
MessageBeep() call. It can be enabled by new CYGWIN option winbeep.
Vaclav Haisman
2003-02-13 Vaclav Haisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* environ.cc (windows_beep): New variable declaration.
(parse_thing): N
12 matches
Mail list logo
