On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 12:45:46PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>Monday, 02 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>CF> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>>>2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>>* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>>>
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 09:51:31PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Now you're just being an asshole.
I don't relish going to Red Hat lawyers and trying to explain this
situation to them but I have just sent an email briefly explaining the
situation. They will be the ones who eventually decide.
cgf
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:38:23PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
So far, no problems. I'm gonna go on record in favor of this patch, in
its 4th incarnation
(http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-patches/2002-q4/msg00222.html).
given that winsup/cygwin/lib/getopt.c(*) still retains its BSD licensing
and
> given that winsup/cygwin/lib/getopt.c(*) still retains its BSD licensing
> and comments, there's no reason to change the (non-)license/public
> domain attribution in egor's pseudo-relocs.c file. Egor's patch #4
> should be able to be committed as-is.
>
> --Chuck
I'm missing something. What
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 08:44:38PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:38:23PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>Charles Wilson wrote:
>>
>>>I've tested Egor's patch and it seems to work just fine, as demonstrated
>>>by the two test cases he posted last week, AND as demonstra
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 07:38:23PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>Charles Wilson wrote:
>
>>I've tested Egor's patch and it seems to work just fine, as demonstrated
>>by the two test cases he posted last week, AND as demonstrated by the
>>test case posted to the binutils list some months ago (it t
Charles Wilson wrote:
I've tested Egor's patch and it seems to work just fine, as demonstrated
by the two test cases he posted last week, AND as demonstrated by the
test case posted to the binutils list some months ago (it tested
pseudo-reloc behavior in the child after a fork).
I've also tes
CF> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
* cygwin/cygwin.sc: Add symbols to handle runtime pseudo-relocs.
* cygwin/lib/_cygwin_crt0_common.cc: Perform pseudo-relocs during
egor duda wrote:
CW> OTOH, if you, Egor Duda, do NOT assign ownership to Red Hat, but instead
CW> release the code as public domain FIRST, then mingw is free to take it.
That's what i was meaning.
CW> Also, Red Hat is free to take it as well -- but they do not have
CW> "ownership" of the co
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>>2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>>* cygwin/cygwin.sc: Add symbols to handle runtime pseu
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CW> OTOH, if you, Egor Duda, do NOT assign ownership to Red Hat, but instead
CW> release the code as public domain FIRST, then mingw is free to take it.
That's what i was meaning.
CW> Also, Red Hat is free to take it as we
Charles Wilson wrote:
Oops. Left a debugging fragment in there. Use the attached version
instead of the previous one.
/* poor man's wincap */
OSVERSIONINFO version;
memset (&version, 0, sizeof version);
version.dwOSVersionInfoSize = sizeof version;
GetVersionEx (&version);
get_conso
ed> Question: How can one distinguish console application from GUI one?
ed> What is the best wording for the error message?
Here's an example. If GetConsoleWindow is available (W2K or XP) it uses
that; otherwise, it uses a different kludge.
The idea is you'd call has_console() or
GetConsoleWin
--- Charles Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two issues: (1) the
licensing "problem", (2) the advisability of mingw
> pseudo-reloc. Item (2) here, item (1) in an earlier message.
>
> One thing that does worry me, though, is the more we rely on special
> runtime tricks and hackish pei-x86 "
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>* cygwin/cygwin.sc: Add symbols to handle runtime pseudo-relocs.
>* cygwin/lib/_cygwin_crt0_common.cc: Perform pseudo-relocs durin
Two issues: (1) the licensing "problem", (2) the advisability of mingw
pseudo-reloc. Item (2) here, item (1) in an earlier message.
One thing that does worry me, though, is the more we rely on special
runtime tricks and hackish pei-x86 "extensions", the more fragile the
whole system becomes.
Two issues: (1) the licensing "problem", (2) the advisability of mingw
pseudo-reloc. Item (1) here, item (2) in a separate message.
CF> I'm not sure that public domain is going to work with the cygwin
license.
ED> IANAL, but i can't see why not.
Here's why: in order for code to be incorpora
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:08:26PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-rel
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:08:26PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>Hi!
>
>Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>
>I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks c
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> EB> egor duda wrote:
>>
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to th
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
>> Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>>
>> I guess i should put it to the
egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks can
also use it.
Is it usable without Cygwin?
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks can
also use it.
Egor.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ 5165
Hi!
Tuesday, 19 November, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> Tuesday, 19 November, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF>> I've made a new version of binutils available for download. This is
CF>> just a refresh from sources.redhat.com. A notable change is the
CF>> additi
26 matches
Mail list logo
