On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:15:13PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:12:02PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>>On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:42:30PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>> >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 05:12:02PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:42:30PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>> >I guess you could do it that way. It
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:42:30PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >I guess you could do it that way. It would look more transparent to the
> >end user if you did. You'd still
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:42:30PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>I guess you could do it that way. It would look more transparent to the
>end user if you did. You'd still have to make it clear that this has to
>happen first t
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 04:09:13PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>I wonder if this could, perhaps, be made more transparent to the
>programmer, by introducing a static marker, for example. Something like
>(again, modulo typos):
>
> void
> initialize_cygwin (int (*main) (int argc, char **argv),
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:40:10PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
> >On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >
> >> I fat fingered my response to Max, ended up sending a personal message
> >> and never noticed until I received a personal rep
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:40:10PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> I fat fingered my response to Max, ended up sending a personal message
>> and never noticed until I received a personal reply from him. I, of
>> course, asked him not to send me p
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Max Kaehn wrote:
> Resending to the cygwin list this time...
>
> On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 19:30, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > Wow! That's great! Thanks for doing this. It is much appreciated. This
> > is something that I had been meaning to do and you did a better job than
> >
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I fat fingered my response to Max, ended up sending a personal message
> and never noticed until I received a personal reply from him. I, of
> course, asked him not to send me personal email which was pretty
> confusing since I'd previously just sen
Resending to the cygwin list this time...
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 19:30, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> Wow! That's great! Thanks for doing this. It is much appreciated. This
> is something that I had been meaning to do and you did a better job than
> I would have. This truly deserves a gold star.
I fat fingered my response to Max, ended up sending a personal message
and never noticed until I received a personal reply from him. I, of
course, asked him not to send me personal email which was pretty
confusing since I'd previously just sent him a personal reply.
Translation: I am a maroon.
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 11:09:10PM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
>On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:53:56PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>> >On 6/3/05, Max Kaehn wrote:
>> >>This patch contains the changes to make it possible to dynamically load
On Sat, 4 Jun 2005, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:53:56PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
> >On 6/3/05, Max Kaehn wrote:
> >>This patch contains the changes to make it possible to dynamically load
> >>cygwin1.dll from MinGW and MSVC applications. The changes to dcrt0
On 6/4/05, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> If you want to me to revert the patch, please let me know.
> Otherwise, please just massage it as you see fit.
No, not a problem. I'll just edit it a bit.
On Sat, Jun 04, 2005 at 05:53:56PM -0700, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>On 6/3/05, Max Kaehn wrote:
>>This patch contains the changes to make it possible to dynamically load
>>cygwin1.dll from MinGW and MSVC applications. The changes to dcrt0.cc
>>are minimal and only affect cygwin_dll_init(). I
On 6/3/05, Max Kaehn wrote:
> This patch contains the changes to make it possible to dynamically load
> cygwin1.dll from MinGW and MSVC applications. The changes to dcrt0.cc are
> minimal and only affect cygwin_dll_init(). I've also added a MinGW test
> program to testsuite and a FAQ so people wi
This patch contains the changes to make it possible to dynamically load
cygwin1.dll from MinGW and MSVC applications. The changes to dcrt0.cc are
minimal and only affect cygwin_dll_init(). I've also added a MinGW test
program to testsuite and a FAQ so people will be able to locate the
test progra
17 matches
Mail list logo
