On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 21:17:47 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:14:59 +0100
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 29 20:48, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
> > > while processing the queued signals, however, sipacket::proce
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 15:41:45 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Dec 3 23:01, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
> > while processing the queued signals, however, sigpacket::process() may
> > set si_signo in the queue to 0 of the entry alread
On Dec 3 23:01, Takashi Yano wrote:
> The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
> while processing the queued signals, however, sigpacket::process() may
> set si_signo in the queue to 0 of the entry already processed but not
> succeed by calling sig_clear(). This patch e
The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
while processing the queued signals, however, sigpacket::process() may
set si_signo in the queue to 0 of the entry already processed but not
succeed by calling sig_clear(). This patch ensures the sig_clear()
to remove the entry fr
On Dec 3 21:31, Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 21:17:47 +0900
> Takashi Yano wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:14:59 +0100
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > On Nov 29 20:48, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > > The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
> > > > while proc
On Tue, 3 Dec 2024 21:17:47 +0900
Takashi Yano wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:14:59 +0100
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Nov 29 20:48, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > > The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
> > > while processing the queued signals, however, sipacket::proce
On Mon, 2 Dec 2024 16:14:59 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 29 20:48, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
> > while processing the queued signals, however, sipacket::process() may
> > set si_signo in the queue to 0 of the entry already
On Nov 29 20:48, Takashi Yano wrote:
> The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
> while processing the queued signals, however, sipacket::process() may
> set si_signo in the queue to 0 of the entry already processed but not
> succeed by calling sig_clear(). This patch en
The queue is cleaned up by removing the entries having si_signo == 0
while processing the queued signals, however, sipacket::process() may
set si_signo in the queue to 0 of the entry already processed but not
succeed by calling sig_clear(). This patch ensures the sig_clear()
to remove the entry fro
