Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Cygwin: signal: Do not handle signal when __SIGFLUSHFAST is sent

2025-01-20 Thread Takashi Yano
On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 16:53:34 +0100 Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Hi Takashi, > > do you want to keep it this way, or do you rather want to change > cygwait to use a local timer? I prefer changing cygwait() to use a local timer because: 1) It makes the __SIGFLUSHFAST patch much simpler. 2) I wonder si

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Cygwin: signal: Do not handle signal when __SIGFLUSHFAST is sent

2025-01-20 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Takashi, do you want to keep it this way, or do you rather want to change cygwait to use a local timer? Thanks, Corinna On Jan 20 17:52, Takashi Yano wrote: > The commit a22a0ad7c4f0 was not exactly the correct thing. Even with > the patch, some hangs still happen. This patch overrides the p

[PATCH v3 2/2] Cygwin: signal: Do not handle signal when __SIGFLUSHFAST is sent

2025-01-20 Thread Takashi Yano
The commit a22a0ad7c4f0 was not exactly the correct thing. Even with the patch, some hangs still happen. This patch overrides the previous commit to fix these hangs. Addresses: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2024-December/256954.html Addresses: https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/2024-Decembe