On Nov 27 08:47, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Nov 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > I'm not opposed to a switch statement consisting of an
> > IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_ARM64 case and a default case adding "-???" or
> > something. Chances are so extremly slim that we'll ever see
On Wed, 27 Nov 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> I'm not opposed to a switch statement consisting of an
> IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_ARM64 case and a default case adding "-???" or
> something. Chances are so extremly slim that we'll ever see another
> CPU emulated on x86_64, we can always add a case for th
On Nov 26 14:27, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > On Nov 25 11:24, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > + switch (wincap.host_machine ())
> > > + {
> > > + case IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_AMD64:
> > > + n = stpcpy (buf, "-x64")
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 25 11:24, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > + switch (wincap.host_machine ())
> > + {
> > + case IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_AMD64:
> > + n = stpcpy (buf, "-x64") - buf;
> > + break;
> > + case IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_ARM6
On Nov 25 11:24, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> From: Jeremy Drake
>
> If the Cygwin dll's architecture is different from the host system's
> architecture, append an additional tag that indicates the host system
> architecture (the Cygwin dll's architecture is already indicated in
> mac
From: Jeremy Drake
If the Cygwin dll's architecture is different from the host system's
architecture, append an additional tag that indicates the host system
architecture (the Cygwin dll's architecture is already indicated in
machine).
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Drake
---
v2: get rid of hardcoded st
