On Nov 26 10:16, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > On Nov 25 11:21, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > > +extern const IMAGE_DOS_HEADER
> > > +dosheader __asm__ ("__image_base__");
> >
> > On second thought, shouldn't we just use Ge
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Btw...
>
> We're doing this because nobody being able to debug ARM64 assembler came
> up with a piece of code checking the ntdll assembler code to find the
> address of the fast_cwd_pointer on ARM64.
>
> You seem to have the knowledge and the means to
On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Nov 25 11:21, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> > +extern const IMAGE_DOS_HEADER
> > +dosheader __asm__ ("__image_base__");
>
> On second thought, shouldn't we just use GetModuleHandle ("cygwin1.dll")
> instead of going asm here?
I was hopi
Btw...
On Nov 25 11:21, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> @@ -4617,14 +4617,12 @@ find_fast_cwd_pointer ()
> static fcwd_access_t **
> find_fast_cwd ()
> {
> - USHORT emulated, hosted;
>fcwd_access_t **f_cwd_ptr;
>
> - /* First check if we're running in WOW64 on ARM64 emulating AM
On Nov 25 11:21, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-patches wrote:
> From: Jeremy Drake
>
> This was already used in the FAST_CWD check, and could be used in a
> couple other places.
>
> I found the "emulated"/process value returned from the function largely
> useless, so I did not cache it. It is useless
From: Jeremy Drake
This was already used in the FAST_CWD check, and could be used in a
couple other places.
I found the "emulated"/process value returned from the function largely
useless, so I did not cache it. It is useless because, as the docs say,
it is set to IMAGE_FILE_MACHINE_UNKNOWN (0)
