RE: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-22 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 4:34 PM > To: Robert Collins > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function > arguments need to be pointers > > >

Re: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-21 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Hallo Robert, >> It looks like you are building in a branch. The version of >> mklink2.cc I have from the main branch is > No, I've realised that I haven't committed it... I've some smei-invasive > changes I've been mulling over in HEAD, and I'd forgotten about that. > I will commit my patch t

RE: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-19 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Michael A Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 11:19 AM > To: Robert Collins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function > arguments need to be pointers

Re: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-18 Thread Michael A Chase
: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 15:45 Subject: RE: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers Well if you recall I had the opposite code in place (as far as I can

Re: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-18 Thread Michael A Chase
From: "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Michael A Chase" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2002 14:59 Subject: RE: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers > Update your win32api - A

RE: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-18 Thread Robert Collins
he culprit.. Rob > -Original Message- > From: Brian Keener [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 8:46 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function > arguments need to be pointers > > > Not to be a

Re: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-18 Thread Brian Keener
Not to be a pain about this - but this have been reported several times in the past and I am running Win2000 and have the W32api-1.3-2 installed. I haven't seen any other w32api come down the pike so that appears to be the most recent. I have the patch - just took it out and no compile - put i

RE: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-18 Thread Robert Collins
Update your win32api - And it should not need the patch, Rob > -Original Message- > From: Michael A Chase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 7:26 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments > n

[PATCH]setup.exe mklink2.cc some function arguments need to be pointers

2002-04-18 Thread Michael A Chase
I couldn't get mklink2.cc to compile until I made the attached changes. It appears that CoCreateInstance() and sl->lpVtbl->QueryInterface() are looking for pointers to values in certain arguments instead of the values. Almost the exact same code is used in src/winsup/cygwin/shortcut.c except for