On Sat, 2002-10-19 at 00:04, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> I've checked it in, Rob. It looked so trivially correct so I felt like
> this was a no-brainer. Hope that's ok.
No problemo. In fact I didn't want to impose, or I'd have asked you to
do so.
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at: http://us
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 10:39:17PM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 18:30, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>>
>> Rob,
>>
>> the location for the static test is wrong. I have moved it 2 lines down.
>
>Ah yes, this reminds me, we've done this 'dance' before. You can crash
>the test if it's n
On Fri, 2002-10-18 at 18:30, Thomas Pfaff wrote:
>
> Rob,
>
> the location for the static test is wrong. I have moved it 2 lines down.
Ah yes, this reminds me, we've done this 'dance' before. You can crash
the test if it's not further done :}.
I'll check this in tomorrow.
Thanks,
Rob
--
---
G
Rob,
the location for the static test is wrong. I have moved it 2 lines down.
Thomas
2002-10-18 Thomas Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* thread.cc (verifyable_object_isvalid): Test for a valid object
pointer before testing for static ptr.
--- thread.cc.org Thu Oct 17 10:28:3
