> -Original Message-
> From: Gary R. Van Sickle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 3:51 PM
> I took it to mean the opposite - if you uninstalled
> *binutils*, it would uninstall gcc because gcc depends on
> them. But on further reflection I'm no longer sure
> >>Likewise, if you click ash off, up pops a window listing everything
> >>that depends on ash, with an addiotnal message of "Warning: removing
> >>ash will cause these packages to be removed as well.
> >>
> >
> >This does make quite a bit of sense to me. But wouldn't MessageBox()
> >or somethin
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:14:28PM -0600, Gary R Van Sickle wrote:
>> Image: you click on 'install' for 'gcc', and up pops a window
>> that lists
>> everything that gcc depends on (both requires as we have today, and
>> 'suggested' items that aren't always needed but are useful - ie
>> autoconf),
> Gary, I haven't reviewed this yet...
>
> Can we, with the patch as is, do the following:
>
> Pop up a chooser?
>
If you're asking if there's still a do_choose(), the answer is no. Does the
patch preclude such functionality? No, but it would require additional
code.
> That's it. Nice and s
Gary, I haven't reviewed this yet...
Can we, with the patch as is, do the following:
Pop up a chooser?
That's it. Nice and simple eh? Well, once I've got the collection based
PickView together, then that should be all there is to it.
What is this in aid of?
Image: you click on 'install' for '
ALT-TAB no longer! This patch integrates the chooser into the wizard interface,
eliminating a field-expedient thread in the process. Changelog also attached:
2002-04-02 Gary R. Van Sickle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* choose.cc: Run indent.
(nextbutton): Remove static variable.
