Re: [PATCH] FAST_CWD: adjust the initial search scope

2017-01-12 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jan 11 20:48, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > On Jan 11 14:21, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > > A *very* recent Windows build adds more code to the preamble of > > > RtlGetCurrentDirectory_U() so that the previous heuristic failed

Re: [PATCH] FAST_CWD: adjust the initial search scope

2017-01-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
Hi Corinna, On Wed, 11 Jan 2017, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jan 11 14:21, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > > A *very* recent Windows build adds more code to the preamble of > > RtlGetCurrentDirectory_U() so that the previous heuristic failed to > > find the call to the locking routine. > > > > Thi

Re: [PATCH] FAST_CWD: adjust the initial search scope

2017-01-11 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Johannes, On Jan 11 14:21, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > A *very* recent Windows build adds more code to the preamble of > RtlGetCurrentDirectory_U() so that the previous heuristic failed to find > the call to the locking routine. > > This only affects the 64-bit version of ntdll, where the 0xe

[PATCH] FAST_CWD: adjust the initial search scope

2017-01-11 Thread Johannes Schindelin
A *very* recent Windows build adds more code to the preamble of RtlGetCurrentDirectory_U() so that the previous heuristic failed to find the call to the locking routine. This only affects the 64-bit version of ntdll, where the 0xe8 byte is now found at offset 40, not the 32-bit version. However, l