On Mon, 18 Nov 2024 16:34:55 +0100
Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> Hi Takashi,
>
> thanks for looking into this problem.
>
> On Nov 18 00:48, Takashi Yano wrote:
> > @@ -640,6 +641,16 @@ sigwait_common (const sigset_t *set, siginfo_t *info,
> > PLARGE_INTEGER waittime)
> > }
> > break;
>
Hi Takashi,
thanks for looking into this problem.
On Nov 18 00:48, Takashi Yano wrote:
> @@ -640,6 +641,16 @@ sigwait_common (const sigset_t *set, siginfo_t *info,
> PLARGE_INTEGER waittime)
> }
> break;
> case WAIT_TIMEOUT:
> + _my_tls.lock ();
> + if (_my_tl
Previously, two bugs exist in sigtimedwait(). One is, that since
_my_tls.sigwait_mask was left non-zero if the signal arrives after
the timeout, sigpacket::process() would wrongly try to handle it.
The other is if a timeout occurs after sigpacket::process() is
called, but not completed yet, the sig
