Corinna Vinschen wrote:
Currently IPC_INFO is defined whenever we include sys/sem.h, but struct
seminfo, which is returned by semctl(IPC_INFO) is defined only for
_KERNEL applications. This inconsistency breaks, for instance,
libmudflap builds. I believe there's no point to have IPC_INFO in
non-_KE
on as long as we can't get semctl(IPC_INFO) results
right anyway. Patch attached.
egor
2004-Jun-08 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include/cygwin/ipc.h: Make IPC_INFO visible only for ipc system
utilities, to make it consistent with declaration of struct seminfo.
Index
Hi!
Monday, 09 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 11:08:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 09:51:31PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>Now you're just being an asshole.
>>
>>I don't relish going to Red Hat lawyers and
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 01:30:24PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>>2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>* cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
>>* cygwin/cygwin.
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Charles Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CW> OTOH, if you, Egor Duda, do NOT assign ownership to Red Hat, but instead
CW> release the code as public domain FIRST, then mingw is free to take it.
That's what i was meaning.
CW> Also, Red Hat is free
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:08:26PM +0300, egor duda wrote:
>>Hi!
>>
>>Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> EB> egor duda wrote:
>>
>>>>Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAI
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
>> Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file
Hi!
Monday, 02 December, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> 2002-12-02 Egor Duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ed> * cygwin/lib/pseudo-reloc.c: New file.
I guess i should put it to the public domain, so that mingw folks can
also use it.
Egor.mailto:[EMAIL PR
Hi!
Tuesday, 19 November, 2002 egor duda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ed> Tuesday, 19 November, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF>> I've made a new version of binutils available for download. This is
CF>> just a refresh from sources.redhat.com. A nota
Hi!
Tuesday, 24 September, 2002 Steve O [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
SO> I was thinking about the deadlock problem some more last night,
SO> and it occured to me that if termios processing were done on
SO> the slave side, some of the buffering and tricky bits of
SO> flushing the write buffer would
Hi!
Sunday, 16 June, 2002 Earnie Boyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
EB> egor duda wrote:
>> NtShutdownSystem() is crude no-caches-flushed-and-no-apps-notified
>> but almost always working way to restart nt system.
EB> Uh, these aren't yet a part of w32api. Cygwin, suppli
Hi!
NtShutdownSystem() is crude no-caches-flushed-and-no-apps-notified
but almost always working way to restart nt system.
egor.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 5165414 fidonet 2:5020/496.19
w32api-ntshutdownsystem.diff
Description: Binary data
w32api-ntshutdownsystem.ChangeLog
Des
Hi!
ed> Tuesday, 11 June, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF>> I just noticed that dumper.exe is not documented in utils.sgml.
CF>> Is anyone interested in taking a stab at it? There should be lots of
CF>> info in the mailing list archives.
Patch attached. Can anybody with sg
Hi!
Monday, 10 June, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 11:13:59AM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:52:28PM -0400, Chris Faylor wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jun 09, 2002 at 11:12:53PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote:
>>> >2002-06-09 Pier
Hi!
Thursday, 06 June, 2002 Corinna Vinschen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CV> On Thu, Jun 06, 2002 at 02:11:46PM +0400, Egor Duda wrote:
>> Attached patch allows regtool to access registry on remote hosts,
>> e.g.:
>>
>> regtool get
>\\bumba\machine\software\mi
Hi!
Attached patch allows regtool to access registry on remote hosts,
e.g.:
regtool get \\bumba\machine\software\microsoft\windows\currentVersion\programFilesDir
egor.mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] icq 5165414 fidonet 2:5020/496.19
regtool-remote-registry-support.diff
Description: Bin
Hi!
Attached is the patch to address the issue reported in
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-04/msg00076.html
I haven't found any way to fix it except disabling security checks for
connectionless sockets.
I'm going to vacation now, so could somebody commit it after reviewing
(of course
Hi!
Saturday, 09 March, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 10:53:28PM -0800, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>>Here is the next in the series of patches to standardize the help and
>>version options in the utils. This also adds GNUish options to dumper.
>>
Hi!
Monday, 28 January, 2002 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> >Chris, I'd actually kinda like to see this included, I can see it being
>>> >handy from time to time.
>>>
>>> I don't agree. It seems to me that this is easy enough to do with gdb.
>>> I don't see any reason for it.
>
Hi!
Tuesday, 04 December, 2001 Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CF> No feedback at all?
two small concerns and one big one:
the patch still relies on the old way to check for OS capabilities
instead of using wincap class.
setting to TRUE or FALSE values via (1 == 0) and (1 == 1) is
21 matches
Mail list logo
