On 2017-06-19 04:45, Corinna Vinschen wrote:> Hi Joe,
>
> As discussed in the previous iteration of this patch, this change
> results in nuking DT_UNKNOWN for reparse points we don't handle. Still,
> IMHO, if we have reparse points we know nothing about, they should stay
> DT_UNKNOWN.
>
> Why i
Hi Joe,
On Jun 14 13:17, Joe Lowe wrote:
> 3rd pass at reparse point handling patch.
>
> Changes to this version of the patch.
> 1. Refactored, smaller, less code impact.
> 2. readdir() and stat() consistency changes now also handle native file
> (non-directory) symbolic links. readir() returns D
On Jun 15 15:30, Erik M. Bray wrote:
> When SA_RESTART is not set on a socket, a blocking send() that is
> interrupted mid-transition by a signal should return success (and
> report just how many bytes were actually transmitted).
>
> The err variable used here was not always guaranteed to be set
>
