On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 06:45:22AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>On 12/04/2013 10:51 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
> One question, though. Assuming start is == size, then the current code
> in CVS extends the fd table by only 1. If that happens often, the
> current code would have to ca
On 12/04/2013 10:51 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
One question, though. Assuming start is == size, then the current code
in CVS extends the fd table by only 1. If that happens often, the
current code would have to call ccalloc/memcpy/cfree a lot. Wouldn't
it in fact be bette
