On Feb 22 10:27, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:44:48PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Feb 22 09:32, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:02:55AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >On Feb 22 10:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> >> On Feb 22 03:40,
On 22/02/2013 9:44 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 22 09:32, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:02:55AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 22 10:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Feb 22 03:40, Yaakov wrote:
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:49:51 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
acce
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:44:48PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 22 09:32, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:02:55AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >On Feb 22 10:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> >> On Feb 22 03:40, Yaakov wrote:
>> >> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:49:51 +
On Feb 22 09:32, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:02:55AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Feb 22 10:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> On Feb 22 03:40, Yaakov wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:49:51 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >> > > > access should go, no doubt abo
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:02:55AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Feb 22 10:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> On Feb 22 03:40, Yaakov wrote:
>> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:49:51 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > > > access should go, no doubt about it.
>> > > >
>> > > > For get_osfhandle and setmo
On Feb 22 10:51, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 22 03:40, Yaakov wrote:
> > On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:49:51 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > > access should go, no doubt about it.
> > > >
> > > > For get_osfhandle and setmode I would prefer maintaining backward
> > > > compatibility with existi
On Feb 22 03:40, Yaakov wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:49:51 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > access should go, no doubt about it.
> > >
> > > For get_osfhandle and setmode I would prefer maintaining backward
> > > compatibility with existing applications. Both variations, with and
> > > wit
On Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:49:51 +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > access should go, no doubt about it.
> >
> > For get_osfhandle and setmode I would prefer maintaining backward
> > compatibility with existing applications. Both variations, with and
> > without underscore are definitely in use.
> >
On Feb 22 09:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Feb 22 01:51, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:18:48AM -0600, Yaakov wrote:
> > >On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:42:36 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> > >> I wasn't fulling grokking the fact that Cygwin explicitly defined the
> > >> ge
On Feb 22 01:51, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:18:48AM -0600, Yaakov wrote:
> >On Thu, 21 Feb 2013 14:42:36 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> I wasn't fulling grokking the fact that Cygwin explicitly defined the
> >> get_osfhandle without an underscore in io.h. Sigh.
10 matches
Mail list logo