Re: [PATCH] suggestion for faster pseudo-reloc.

2012-09-02 Thread Charles Wilson
On 9/2/2012 1:51 PM, Jin-woo Ye wrote: > Now it is clear that this patch would be needed other relevant projects > such as mingw, mingw-w64. thanks for your effort on simplified one. Yes, while it is not required that all of those systems stay exactly in sync, there has been some effort in ensurin

Re: [PATCH] suggestion for faster pseudo-reloc.

2012-09-02 Thread Jin-woo Ye
On 2012-09-02 PM 7:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Hi Jin-woo, On Aug 26 10:59, Jin-woo Ye wrote: This patch fixes the problem making pseudo-reloc too slow when there is many pseudo-reloc entries in rdata section by deciding when not to call Virtual{Query,Protect} to save overhead. I tested this pa

Re: [PATCH] suggestion for faster pseudo-reloc.

2012-09-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Hi Jin-woo, On Aug 26 10:59, Jin-woo Ye wrote: > This patch fixes the problem making pseudo-reloc too slow when there > is many pseudo-reloc entries in rdata section by deciding when not > to call Virtual{Query,Protect} to save overhead. > I tested this patch and time taken for pseudo-reloc reduce