On 23/05/2011 3:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 22 14:42, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 21/05/2011 9:44 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
This patch has the parent sort its dll list topologically by
dependencies. Previously, att
On 22/05/2011 4:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2011 at 09:04:40AM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 21/05/2011 9:41 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:31:23PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
This is the first of a series of patches, sent in separate emai
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 12:47:36PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
>The best way to improve performance of this part of fork() would be to
>figure out how to force a dll to load in the right place on the first
>try. Achieving this admittedly "difficult" task would eliminate multiple
>syscalls per dll
On 24/05/2011 9:05 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 24 07:27, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 23/05/2011 3:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 22 14:42, Ryan Johnson wrote:
In theory, this should completely eliminate the case where us
loading one DLL pulls in dependencies automatically (= uncontrol
On 24/05/2011 12:14 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 22 14:42, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 21/05/2011 9:44 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
This patch has the parent sort its dll list topologically by
dependencies. Previously, at
On May 22 14:42, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 21/05/2011 9:44 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> >>Hi all,
> >>
> >>This patch has the parent sort its dll list topologically by
> >>dependencies. Previously, attempts to load a DLL_LOAD dll ri
On May 24 07:27, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> On 23/05/2011 3:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On May 22 14:42, Ryan Johnson wrote:
> >>In theory, this should completely eliminate the case where us
> >>loading one DLL pulls in dependencies automatically (= uncontrolled
> >>and at Windows' whim). The prob
On 23/05/2011 3:31 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On May 22 14:42, Ryan Johnson wrote:
On 21/05/2011 9:44 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 02:31:37PM -0400, Ryan Johnson wrote:
Hi all,
This patch has the parent sort its dll list topologically by
dependencies. Previously, att
On May 23 17:28, Eric Blake wrote:
> This depends on the newlib patch:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/newlib/2011/msg00215.html
>
> In fact, if that patch goes in, then this one is required to avoid a
> link failure; this one can probably go in first but makes no difference
> to perror without the new
