On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 01:33:36PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jan 11 14:26, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>> On 11/01/2011 08:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> > I wasn't quite sure either, but while running cygcheck with Jon's patch
>> > it started to make more sense. We can also change the docs to ask
On Jan 13 13:04, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 13/01/2011 12:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On Jan 11 14:26, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> >> On 11/01/2011 08:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >>> I wasn't quite sure either, but while running cygcheck with Jon's patch
> >>> it started to make more sense. We can also
On 13/01/2011 12:33, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Jan 11 14:26, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>> On 11/01/2011 08:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>>> I wasn't quite sure either, but while running cygcheck with Jon's patch
>>> it started to make more sense. We can also change the docs to ask for
>>> `cygcheck -svr
On Jan 11 14:26, Jon TURNEY wrote:
> On 11/01/2011 08:10, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > I wasn't quite sure either, but while running cygcheck with Jon's patch
> > it started to make more sense. We can also change the docs to ask for
> > `cygcheck -svrd' output, but I guess we should just wait and s
