On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>On Jan 5 19:50, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>>
>> Currently, for cygcheck -s implies -d. This seems rather unhelpful.
>>
>> I'm afraid I've lost the thread which inspired this, but in it the reporter
>> provided cygcheck -svr output as re
On Jan 5 19:50, Jon TURNEY wrote:
>
> Currently, for cygcheck -s implies -d. This seems rather unhelpful.
>
> I'm afraid I've lost the thread which inspired this, but in it the reporter
> provided cygcheck -svr output as requested, but this did not help diagnose
> what ultimately turned out to
