On Jan 10 19:39, Andy Koppe wrote:
> Attached is a patch for making the scanf format string (more)
> byte-transparent. It actually couldn't deal with non-ASCII chars at
> all, even valid ones, due to comparing an 'unsigned char' with a
> (signed) 'char'. And when encountering an invalid byte, it wo
Attached is a patch for making the scanf format string (more)
byte-transparent. It actually couldn't deal with non-ASCII chars at
all, even valid ones, due to comparing an 'unsigned char' with a
(signed) 'char'. And when encountering an invalid byte, it would go
backwards in the format string. Fina
On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 12:12:40PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>Still, it looks bad since it seems so superfluous. I don't think we
>should rely so heavily on the compiler optimization.
Ditto.
cgf
On Jan 9 19:47, Dave Korn wrote:
> Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>
> > Concerning fstat_helper, I don't like to slip another layer into these
> > calls to pamper an anal-retentive compiler. I would rather like to fix
> > this by removing the FILETIME type from the affected places and use
> > LARGE_INT
