Re: [PATCH] better stackdumps

2008-03-19 Thread Brian Dessent
Pedro Alves wrote: > Sorry I missed the discussion at [EMAIL PROTECTED] What does info > sharelibrary say? > The last I looked at this, it worked. Is this broken in gdb head > and on the cygwin distributed gdb? With gdb CVS HEAD, it gives: (gdb) i sh >FromTo Syms Read Share

Re: [PATCH] better stackdumps

2008-03-19 Thread Pedro Alves
A Wednesday 19 March 2008 15:56:55, Brian Dessent wrote: > Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Sorry, but I don't like this concept. This bloats the cygwin DLL for a > > condition that would be better served by either using gdb or generating > > a real coredump. > > I hear you, but part of the motivatio

Re: [PATCH] better stackdumps

2008-03-19 Thread Brian Dessent
Christopher Faylor wrote: > Sorry, but I don't like this concept. This bloats the cygwin DLL for a > condition that would be better served by either using gdb or generating > a real coredump. I hear you, but part of the motivation for writing this was a recent thread the other week on the gdb li