Re: Failure in rebuilding Cygwin-1.5.24-2 with recent newlib

2007-06-16 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sat, Jun 16, 2007 at 09:47:41PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >On Jun 16 08:38, Brian Dessent wrote: >> This is just due to __FBSDID not getting #defined to blank properly. >> The file includes sys/cdefs.h and newlib's copy contains the required >> bit (#define __FBSDID(x) /* nothing */) howev

Re: Failure in rebuilding Cygwin-1.5.24-2 with recent newlib

2007-06-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 16 21:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > On Jun 16 08:38, Brian Dessent wrote: > > This is just due to __FBSDID not getting #defined to blank properly. > > The file includes sys/cdefs.h and newlib's copy contains the required > > bit (#define __FBSDID(x) /* nothing */) however when building with

Re: Failure in rebuilding Cygwin-1.5.24-2 with recent newlib

2007-06-16 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Jun 16 08:38, Brian Dessent wrote: > This is just due to __FBSDID not getting #defined to blank properly. > The file includes sys/cdefs.h and newlib's copy contains the required > bit (#define __FBSDID(x) /* nothing */) however when building with > Cygwin, the Cygwin headers are used and Cygwin

Re: Failure in rebuilding Cygwin-1.5.24-2 with recent newlib

2007-06-16 Thread Brian Dessent
Angelo Graziosi wrote: > > I want to flag that rebuilding Cygwin-1.5.24-2 with recent checkout of > newlib fails in this way: It's really not a good idea to mix and match like that, you can run into subtle breakage that way as the two are meant to be kept in sync. For example, if newlib added a