On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:57:42PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
>>On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:49:06PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>>> -1677,7 +1681,7 main (int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>>if (i)
>>> puts ("");
>>>- cygcheck (arg
Christopher Faylor cygwin.com> writes:
>
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:49:06PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
> > -1677,7 +1681,7 main (int argc, char **argv)
> > {
> >if (i)
> > puts ("");
> >- cygcheck (argv[i]);
> >+ ok &= cygcheck (argv[i]);
>
> Why are
On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:49:06PM +, Eric Blake wrote:
>@@ -1677,7 +1681,7 @@ main (int argc, char **argv)
> {
>if (i)
> puts ("");
>- cygcheck (argv[i]);
>+ ok &= cygcheck (argv[i]);
Why are you anding the result here? Why not just set ok = cygcheck (...)?
As mentioned on cygwin (hopefully I'm not falling afoul of trivial patch size,
since I don't have assignment; and hopefully gmane didn't kill this):
2005-07-05 Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* cygcheck.cc (track_down, cygcheck): Return true on success.
(main): Reflect cygcheck
