Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 04:29:38PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >>I thought that Eric Blake implied that // *had* to be translated to /, >>as per POSIX. I wonder how many programs out there translate a >>standalone '//' to '/'. > >No, POSIX requires th

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I thought that Eric Blake implied that // *had* to be translated to /, > as per POSIX. I wonder how many programs out there translate a > standalone '//' to '/'. No, POSIX requires that / be untouched, // be implementation-defined (hint - - define

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Eric Blake
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > Sigh. We need a bash maintainer. > We need to have // working for mkdir -p to work, from what I > understand of the code snippet that was sent to the list. `mkdir -p' only uses chdir(), mkdir(), and stat() calls. For //server/share/newdir, the stra

Re: [PATCH 21.5.20] HAVE_DECL_SYS_SIGLIST instead of SYS_SIGLIST_DECLARED in sysdep.c

2005-05-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 08:28:01PM +0200, Dr. Volker Zell wrote: >2005-05-06 Dr. Volker Zell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * sysdep.c: Use autoconf 2.59's HAVE_DECL_SYS_SIGLIST instead of > SYS_SIGLIST_DECLARED. Um. Wrong mailing list Volker. cgf

[PATCH 21.5.20] HAVE_DECL_SYS_SIGLIST instead of SYS_SIGLIST_DECLARED in sysdep.c

2005-05-06 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
2005-05-06 Dr. Volker Zell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * sysdep.c: Use autoconf 2.59's HAVE_DECL_SYS_SIGLIST instead of SYS_SIGLIST_DECLARED. diff -u -p /usr/src/xemacs-21.5.20/src/sysdep.c.orig /usr/src/xemacs-21.5.20/src/sysdep.c --- /usr/src/xemacs-21.5.20/src/sysdep.c.orig 2005-0

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:07:13AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >That's not Paul Eggert's position, >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2005-05/msg00251.html I don't expect >problems with //, we had it working in cvs for a while and only bash >had issues. Program translating // to / should already hav

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
- Original Message - From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 10:58 AM Subject: Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives > On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:55:29AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > >- Original Message - > >From: "Christopher Fayl

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 10:55:29AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >- Original Message - >From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: >Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 10:22 AM >Subject: Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives > >>Well, that was kinda my point. If we can't remove the

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
- Original Message - From: "Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 10:22 AM Subject: Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives > Well, that was kinda my point. If we can't remove the "//" handling because > it breaks bash then adding opendir/readdir stuff

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 09:27:55AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >cgf wrote: >> On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:57:08PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > >>>The code should handle "//" correctly, but path.cc still transforms it >>>into "/", because of the bash bug. > >> Is that fixed in the current ba

Re: [Patch]: mkdir -p and network drives

2005-05-06 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
cgf wrote: > On Thu, May 05, 2005 at 10:57:08PM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: >>The code should handle "//" correctly, but path.cc still transforms it >>into "/", because of the bash bug. > Is that fixed in the current bash? AFAIK Corinna fixed it once, but the patch got lost and it's currentl