Hi All,
This patch is the first of many patches as part of my attempt to
clean up warnings/errors triggered when building with "-W -Wall
pedantic" flags. In this patch, I have "decorated" all
occurances of gcc c/c++ extensions with the the __extension__
label. It is necessary to do this since p
On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 02:01:30PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>I just wanted to say that I haven't forgotten about this patch and I plan
>on adding it + some modifications soon.
I've just checked in a superset of this patch. I deleted a lot more
stuff from window.cc (and wininfo.h) and adde
On Sat, Mar 26, 2005 at 08:48:14AM -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
>On NT systems, and using the Unicode versions of Windows syscalls, Windows
>supports up to 32k for pathnames, with component names up to 255 bytes, by
>using the \\?\ prefix. Cygwin could actually support the XSI-recommended
>minimum PAT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The attached program is a derivative of the configure-time test used in
coreutils to see if getcwd is broken. Many systems support relative
pathnames whose absolute name is longer than PATH_MAX, and on some of
them, getcwd fails in that case. But I u
