Re: Patch: Re: Bug in stat()?

2002-05-02 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 12:06:16PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: >Is this the right list for this patch? I feel like I was writing to >/dev/null with the main cygwin list, as no one has responded to this thread. Problems with your mail reader? http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2002-05/msg00106.html I can

RE: Patch: Re: Bug in stat()?

2002-05-02 Thread Gary R Van Sickle
> Is this the right list for this patch? I feel like I was writing to > /dev/null with the main cygwin list, as no one has responded > to this thread. > Right list for the patch; the explanatory stuff probably fits better on cygwin@ though, with something like "Patch fixing this posted to cygwin

Patch: Re: Bug in stat()?

2002-05-02 Thread Eric Blake
Is this the right list for this patch? I feel like I was writing to /dev/null with the main cygwin list, as no one has responded to this thread. Original Message From: Eric Blake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Patch: Re: Bug in stat()? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Eric Blake <[EMAIL

Re: SSH -R problem

2002-05-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 11:48:10AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Although what you propose is better than nothing, I would not do > anything until we really understand what's going on. Ok with me. > Win98/ME > 1) CLOSE_WAIT / WSAENOBUFS >Application level fix: fcntl("close on fork") >

Re: SSH -R problem

2002-05-02 Thread Pierre A. Humblet
Corinna Vinschen wrote: > I'd propose to try it first as I said in my previous mail: Corinna, did you see my e-mails of last two evenings? - the blocking is a Win98 problem, the linger helps only for NT - for NT, linger is (probably) not the "real" solution. Although what you propose is better

Re: Why no shutdown? (was: Re: SSH -R problem)

2002-05-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Wed, May 01, 2002 at 10:34:47AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote: > On cygwin-patches@, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > > >So an ideal fix would detect "end of life" situations. Here is a brain > > >storming idea: on a Cygwin close(), do a shutdown(.,2), free the Cygwin > > Oops, absolutely no shutdown(). >

Re: SSH -R problem

2002-05-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 10:12:08AM -0400, Pierre A. Humblet wrote: > Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > That makes sense... but doesn't that again break something else? > > What it might break is the case for which linger was added in the first > place, i.e. processes terminating and Windows flush

Re: dtors run twice on dll detach (update)

2002-05-02 Thread Benjamin Riefenstahl
Hi Robert, "Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > If we just avoid setting up the destructor calls using atexit > > then the destructors will only run once. So, in the normal > > case, the destructor will run after much cleanup has occurred > > in the cygwin DLL (specifically in th

RE: [PATCH] dtors run twice on dll detach (update)

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 1:49 AM > If we just avoid setting up the destructor calls using atexit > then the destructors will only run once. So, in the normal > case, the destructor will run after much

RE: IPC test suite

2002-05-02 Thread Robert Collins
> -Original Message- > From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 2:16 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: IPC test suite > > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 12:04:06AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: > >AFAICT I'm now testing every aspect (barring