Fixes a warning "no return statement in function returning non-void",
and solves a crash running --help.
Hopefully this is the right place for this now, since I am not interesting
in becoming a package maintainer as the list description says ;)From f4821db24d4e4feca16e4aea58843128e233ef4e Mon Sep
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Many thanks.
>
> I posted the patches to incorporate this in our CI here:
> https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2025q2/013646.html
>
> I'm not crazy about using pskill, not least because because it's a bit awkward
> to get into place
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > We (@mati865 and I) just managed to get llvm/clang 20.1.2 building and
> > targeting Cygwin over at MSYS2, and I was wondering if you had anyone
> > interested in these pat
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > That kind of thing would have to happen in the local Cygport or Scallywag CI
> > Windows environment, as the calm infrastructure is Fedora.
> >
> &
Nice! Please note that there are updated patches in MSYS2-packages/llvm
which replace some of the 'hack' patches with more proper methods (which I
opened PRs upstream for, but I've not gotten any replies to them yet).
Also, there is an issue currently outstanding, for which I opened an
upstream PR
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Previously, Xu Chiheng offered ITA for llvm, however, we haven't
> heard from him in over a year.
>
> Recently, I could successfully build llvm/clang related packages
> version 20.1.2 thanks to MSYS2 guys.
>
> Therefore, I would like to ad
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > Previously, Xu Chiheng offered ITA for llvm, however, we haven't
> > heard from him in over a year.
> >
> > Recently, I could successfull
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 12:46:16 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano wrote:
> >
> > > cygwin packages lack lld, so clang uses ld (correct2?) to link,
> > > which does not support other targets than x86 (i686
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> I did a quick look through the attachments to the [ITA] llvm email
Sorry for the flurry of replies... I noticed you had an old, *wrong*
patch for dli_fname compile error in Signals.inc... See the correct
version in https://github.
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > #include
> >
> > int main() {
> > std::cout << "Hello" << std::endl;
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> Thanks. But In my environment, it works as expected.
>
> $ clang++ hello.cc
> $ ./a.exe
> Hello
> $
Great! It also works for me in MS
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> +set(CYGWIN_LIBRARIES ${MINGW_RUNTIME} cygwin advapi32
> +shell32 user32 kernel32 ${CYGWIN_RUNTIME})
Is that MINGW_RUNTIME right, or should it have been CYGWIN_RUNTIME in a
copy-paste error? Because MINGW_RUNT
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote:
> A new version 1.4.17-4 of the cygutils packages with a corrected
> 'cygstart' is now making its way to the mirrors.
Can I ask why patches are made in the packaging rather than applied to
the cygwin-apps/cygutils git repository, given that this
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 10:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jeremy,
> > >
> > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:50:52 +0900
> > > To avoid this incompatibility, I tried to
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 25/04/2025 01:55, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > I figured I'd try my hand at a dead-simple package. Let me know if I
> > screwed anything up, or when I should send my SSH key (which I think is
> > the next step).
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Maybe setting -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=20 would work around this? It would at
> least take a different path in that if/elif block in basic_string.
It does indeed work around this, and builds a functional dylib llvm/clang
on Cygwin.
&
On Sun, 13 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > Yes. However, see my previous mail for the strange issue I ran into
> > trying to do this (strange because it works fine on MSYS2 but fails on
> > Cygwin)
>
> The same happens for me as well...
Maybe you'll have some luck debugging it.
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > > Yes. However, see my previous mail for the strange issue I ran into
> > > trying to do this (strange because it works fine on MSYS2 but fails on
&
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 13 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > > Yes. However, see my previous mail for the strange issue I ran into
>
On Sun, 4 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > llvm and clang on playground branch are updated.
>
> I rebased and pushed to clang, but I'm doing another build with llvm
> before I push it (I turne
On Mon, 5 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> llvm and clang on playground branch are updated.
I rebased and pushed to clang, but I'm doing another build with llvm
before I push it (I turned on tests, but I was only building with
LLVM_INCLUDE_TESTS not LLVM_BUILD_TESTS). I wasn't abl
On Mon, 5 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> I've pushed to both clang and llvm, allowing clang's tests to run. I get
> Total Discovered Tests: 46304
> Skipped : 8 (0.02%)
> Unsupported : 194 (0.42%)
> Passed : 46042 (99.4
On Mon, 5 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2025 00:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > I've pushed llvm now too. I had to hack patch one unittest's cmake file
> > to get it to link (it was getting multiple definition errors like
> > c-index-test, but because t
On Mon, 5 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> I've pushed to both clang and llvm, allowing clang's tests to run. I get
> Total Discovered Tests: 46304
> Skipped : 8 (0.02%)
> Unsupported : 194 (0.42%)
> Passed : 46042 (99.4
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 19:02:29 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > This package uses python3 at build time. I inherit-ed python3, would
> > I be better off putting it in BUILD_REQUIR
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> I figured I'd try my hand at a dead-simple package. Let me know if I
> screwed anything up, or when I should send my SSH key (which I think is
> the next step). 3 of the patches (not the cygwin-msys one) are from
>
I figured I'd try my hand at a dead-simple package. Let me know if I
screwed anything up, or when I should send my SSH key (which I think is
the next step). 3 of the patches (not the cygwin-msys one) are from
Gentoo.
https://repology.org/project/udis86/versions
udis86.cygport
Description: Binar
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On Tue, 22 Apr 2025 15:50:52 +0900
> To avoid this incompatibility, I tried to build llvm/clang without
> both 0005-use_cxx11_abi.patch and 0110-use_cxx11_abi.patch, and add
> -DCMAKE_CXX_STANDARD=20
> instead. It makes llvm
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025, Mark Geisert via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> On 4/24/2025 11:57 AM, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Mark Geisert via Cygwin wrote:
> >
> > > A new version 1.4.17-4 of the cygutils packages with a corrected
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Later (2014-12-25!) developer sources:
>
> https://github.com/vmt/udis86
>
> updated fork sources additions and fixes from multiple acked upstreams:
>
> https://github.com/canihavesomecoffee/udis86
>
> used by Debian packager:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Philippe Baril Lecavalier via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 2025-04-25 3:28 p.m., Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > Do you think I should follow Debian here and use that fork? Do I have to
> > source the package from git then? Gentoo still fo
Name: Jeremy Drake
BEGIN SSH2 PUBLIC KEY
Comment: "Jeremy Drake"
B3NzaC1yc2EDAQABAAABAQDSw43bWANkUZLgTU1e9yedgMWHUBncobL2kY3bVe
ftXZTsx0aDy+fxvuFg1CwAREiSi/MYqHe4wagQfXVMOV+yHtP8PaWteGVOQ5NaLq2XPbQl
qGJ5a4wagu9ORE8Kf4krcfDB97Q571UQ9KZGN2fHnPN8UoAZwXPi1JRJgCEAFnHYf/KMOD
WthbF5YTjq5
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano wrote:
> cygwin packages lack lld, so clang uses ld (correct2?) to link,
> which does not support other targets than x86 (i686, x86_64).
> Therefore I disabled them.
Correct. At least for cygwin target, it actually calls gcc to do the
link, which in turns calls
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > I've also seen a crash with a simple "Hello world" C++ iostreams program,
> > only on Cygwin not MSYS2. I suspect it is related to the C++11 ABI thing,
> > but it is not worked around by defining the macro. There should also be a
>
> C
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Nah, not hard or complicated, I already went through the process locally.
> I just need to memorialize it in the cyport (and look at my setup log to
> see the handful of sphinx packages I installed, off the top of my head
>
We (@mati865 and I) just managed to get llvm/clang 20.1.2 building and
targeting Cygwin over at MSYS2, and I was wondering if you had anyone
interested in these patches to update the package(s) in Cygwin? I'm not
particularly interested in taking on more responsibilities, but I guess I
could take
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Thanks for the advice. I was trying to build DLL with gcc.
> Now I can successfully build llvm without DLL using gcc.
>
> Next step I am trying is building clang using gcc. It seems
> that clang is the same, I mean, DLL should be disabled
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> We (@mati865 and I) just managed to get llvm/clang 20.1.2 building and
> targeting Cygwin over at MSYS2, and I was wondering if you had anyone
> interested in these patches to update the package(s) in Cygwin? I'm not
> particularly interested in taking o
On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > Nah, not hard or complicated, I already went through the process locally.
> > I just need to memorialize it in the cyport (and look at my setup log to
>
On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Previously, Xu Chiheng offered ITA for llvm, however, we haven't
> heard from him in over a year.
>
> Recently, I could successfully build llvm/clang related packages
> version 20.1.2 thanks to MSYS2 guys.
>
> Therefore, I would like to ad
On Sat, 3 May 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On 2025-05-03 12:45, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > > Previously, Xu Chiheng offered ITA for llvm, however, we haven't heard
> &
On Sat, 3 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Sat, 3 May 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > On 2025-05-03 12:45, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > > > Previously
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> That kind of thing would have to happen in the local Cygport or Scallywag CI
> Windows environment, as the calm infrastructure is Fedora.
>
> Could we use gendef and nm/objdump to compare Cygwin definitions and uses, or
> is there some loa
> @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ CYGCMAKE_ARGS="
> -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
>
> -DLLVM_INCLUDE_TOOLS=ON -DLLVM_BUILD_TOOLS=ON
> + -DLLVM_INSTALL_GTEST=ON
> -DLLVM_INCLUDE_EXAMPLES=ON -DLLVM_BUILD_EXAMPLES=OFF
> -DLLVM_INCLUDE_UTILS=ON -DLLVM_BUILD_UTILS=ON -DLLVM_INSTALL_UTILS=ON
On Sat, 10 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2025 10:46:18 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > > @@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ CYGCMAKE_ARGS="
> > > -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
> > >
> > > -DLLVM_INCLUDE_TOOLS=ON -DLLVM_BUILD_TOOLS=ON
> > > + -DLLVM_INSTALL_GTEST=ON
> > >
On Sat, 10 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Fri, 9 May 2025 13:48:00 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > Sorry, I don't understand why it is necessary even for
> > > bootstrapping. Could you please let me know t
I don't know much about the finer points of cygports, but I'll comment on
a couple of things
On Sat, 10 May 2025, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> The packaging does not succeed if the build runs in a case-insensitive
> filesystem due to parallel usr/share/doc/{LLVM,llvm} directories.
That sucks, a
On Mon, 5 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > I've pushed to both clang and llvm, allowing clang's tests to run. I get
> > Total Discovered Tests: 46304
> > Skipped : 8 (0.0
On Wed, 14 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> I pushed updated llvm, clang, libcxx, libcxxabi, compiler-rt,
> libunwind, and lld packages.
For the lld push, you did not include the added patch file. But I suspect
that I would be against it. The issue is that lld does not have the
a
On Tue, 13 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 5 May 2025 17:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
> > Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > > On Mon, 5 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > >
> &
On Wed, 14 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Mon, 5 May 2025 17:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > On Mon, 5 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > I've pushed to both clang and llvm, allowing clang's tests to run
On Tue, 13 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > Test result of current clang local head:
> > Total Discovered Tests: 46304
> > Skipped : 8 (0.02%)
> > Unsupported
On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jeremy Drake wrote:
> On Tue, 13 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 14 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 5 May 2025 17:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
> > > Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > > >
On Sun, 25 May 2025, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 24/05/2025 19:27, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Sat, 24 May 2025, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps writes:
> > > > I made a little attempt to update libgit2 based on
On Sat, 24 May 2025, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps writes:
> > I made a little attempt to update libgit2 based on what MSYS2 did, since
> > it is apparently needed for cargo (and it seems like it's getting close to
> > possible
On Thu, 15 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> The patch missig from repository I have added is as attached.
> I thought we should add /usr/lib/w32ap at the same place
> where /usr/lib is added. But I could not find.
getProcessTriple is the host triple. My lld hacks were done based o
I made a little attempt to update libgit2 based on what MSYS2 did, since
it is apparently needed for cargo (and it seems like it's getting close to
possible to build cargo for Cygwin). Unfortunately, it failed to build in
scallywag:
https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/15219165082/job/
On Sat, 31 May 2025, Jon Turney wrote:
> On 26/05/2025 19:41, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 May 2025, Jon Turney wrote:
> >
> [...]
> >
> > Should I add a big comment documenting the test failures, or a separate
> > file?
> No wrong ans
On Sat, 31 May 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
>
> Note that the previous releases are 0.23.4-2 libgit2_23, 0.24.6-1 libgit2_24,
> 0.25.1-1 libgit2_25, unfortunately, so 1.9.0-1 would have to be libgit2_109
> for rpmvercmp to sort it higher, with appropriate changes elsewhere!
Does this
On Sun, 8 Jun 2025, Brian Inglis via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Could you please check the latest curl update when you have some time?
My last run was with libcurl 8.14.1-1, libgit2 1.9.0-1, openssl 3.0.16-2
and it worked fine. I've got a 'main' branch that bootstraps rust
nightly, and a 'test-cygwin'
On Wed, 4 Jun 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> There are a number of test failures, particularly in llvm. A bunch of
> them are JIT related segfaults, so I kind of suspect some sort of
> low-hanging fruit fix that could knock out several of them at once. I
> haven'
On Fri, 16 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2025, Jeremy Drake wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 May 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 14 May 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> > >
> > &
On Sun, 1 Jun 2025, Jon Turney wrote:
> What do you think are the remaining issues (if any?) to resolve before this
> can be deployed?
I think it's about ready for a test release anyway. I would probably not
have clang_REQUIRES have libc++-devel and libunwind-devel in it, I have
not personally e
I made an effort to make github workflows to bootstrap rust, and in the
process llvm/clang, for Cygwin.
https://github.com/jeremyd2019/cygwin-rust-bootstrap/blob/main/.github/workflows/bootstrap_llvm.yml
https://github.com/jeremyd2019/cygwin-rust-bootstrap/actions/runs/15260152503
The LLVM packag
They released libgit2 1.9.1, so I guess I'll adopt the package after all
so I can keep it up to date... I've pushed to the playground branch now.
https://github.com/cygwin/scallywag/actions/runs/15505200622
inherit cmake
NAME="libgit2"
VERSION=1.9.1
RELEASE=1
CATEGORY="Libs"
SUMMARY="Git C libra
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps writes:
> > There is another PR in progress that adds more symlinks for DLLs on
> > Cygwin. This is a little bit confusing from a packaging standpoint
> > because these are un-versioned
On Wed, 2 Jul 2025, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> * Ensures that the packaging git repo is updated when the package is.
>
> * Ensures that the source package is complete; and that the build works and is
> repeatable.
>
> * Ensures that the package is built in a sterile environment.
>
> * Ens
I just saw you updated some patches. Most of the patches are now already
upstream and are included to backport to 20.1.x.
(https://github.com/msys2/MSYS2-packages/blob/master/llvm/README-patches.md)
Specifically, your modification to the clang 0110 patch adding a Cygwin
toolchain should be a follo
On Wed, 9 Jul 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> I just saw you updated some patches. Most of the patches are now already
> upstream and are included to backport to 20.1.x.
> (https://github.com/msys2/MSYS2-packages/blob/master/llvm/README-patches.md)
> Specifically, your
On Fri, 11 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> BTW, I just realized we haven’t submitted the ITP for lld yet.
> Jeremy, would you like to do it? Or shall I do that?
> I'm asking because I did not contribute anything for lld.
I sent something. I was holding off because it can't be bui
LLD is a linker from the LLVM project that is a drop-in replacement for
system linkers and runs much faster than them. It also provides features
that are useful for toolchain developers.
Current packaging is in the playground repository, on the lld branch.
https://cygwin.com/cgit/cygwin-packages/p
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 23:27:10 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > Also, I am confused about #define-ing constinit in the libc++ patches. Is
> > there still some issue with constinit?
>
> Without this patch, I have seen errors like:
> libc
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Hi Jeremy,
>
> Thanks!
>
> BTW, if you don't mind, would you consider becoming a co-maintainer of the
> LLVM,
> Clang, and LLD packages? Since you’ve been the key contributor, I feel you’re
> the one who truly deserves to be the maintaine
On Thu, 10 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2025 23:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > On Wed, 9 Jul 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > I just saw you updated some patches. Most of the patches are now already
>
On Wed, 16 Jul 2025, ASSI via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps writes:
> > How should the libclang python binding work then (it uses ctypes)?
>
>
> I don't know, but Cygwin can't be the only platform having this
> peculiar problem unle
On Fri, 18 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
>
> > I pushed the playground lld branch as master to lld. Do you think that it
> > would make sense to push the llvm/clang playground branches to master?
> > llvm branched &
On Fri, 18 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 22:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > On Fri, 18 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
> > > Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, Ta
On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 16:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 11 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > BTW, I just realized we haven’t submitted the ITP for lld yet.
> > > Jeremy, would you like to do it?
On Fri, 18 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 17:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 15 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 16:16:09 -0700 (PDT)
> > > Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 11 Jul 2025,
On Fri, 18 Jul 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 22:10:00 -0700 (PDT)
> Jeremy Drake wrote:
> > remote:
> > remote: FATAL -- ACCESS DENIED
> > remote: Repogit/cygwin-packages/llvm
> > remote: UserJeremy_Drake
> > remote: Stage From gi
On Thu, 17 Jul 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> llvm branched & released rc1 of llvm 21.1.0 today, and I updated the
> cygports (and removed a *ton* of patches)
There seems to be some issue with clang 21.1.0-rc1 being linked with GNU
ld. Stripping these binaries with GN
On Sun, 15 Jun 2025, Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps wrote:
> I pushed update to 20.1.7 and synced patches with upstream, current
> test results:
> llvm:
> Total Discovered Tests: 65227
> Skipped :52 (0.08%)
> Unsupported : 2197 (3.37%)
> Passed
81 matches
Mail list logo
