Re: [ITP] stress-ng 0.18.04

2025-04-11 Thread Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps
On 07/04/2025 16:34, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 15/09/2024 16:11, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 13/09/2024 18:33, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: I would like to contribute stress-ng. Also present in Debian, Fedora, FreeBSD, Ubun

Re: llvm/clang packages

2025-04-11 Thread Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:45:06 -0700 (PDT) Jeremy Drake wrote: > We (@mati865 and I) just managed to get llvm/clang 20.1.2 building and > targeting Cygwin over at MSYS2, and I was wondering if you had anyone > interested in these patches to update the package(s) in Cygwin? I'm not > particularly int

Re: [ITP] stress-ng 0.18.04

2025-04-11 Thread Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps
Jon Turney wrote: On 07/04/2025 16:34, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 15/09/2024 16:11, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: On 13/09/2024 18:33, Christian Franke via Cygwin-apps wrote: I would like to contribute stress-ng. Also present in Debian, Fe

Re: [ITP] stress-ng 0.18.04

2025-04-11 Thread Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025, Jon Turney via Cygwin-apps wrote: > Many thanks. > > I posted the patches to incorporate this in our CI here: > https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin-patches/2025q2/013646.html > > I'm not crazy about using pskill, not least because because it's a bit awkward > to get into place

Re: llvm/clang packages

2025-04-11 Thread Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps
On Fri, 11 Apr 2025, Takashi Yano via Cygwin-apps wrote: > On Thu, 10 Apr 2025 12:45:06 -0700 (PDT) > Jeremy Drake wrote: > > We (@mati865 and I) just managed to get llvm/clang 20.1.2 building and > > targeting Cygwin over at MSYS2, and I was wondering if you had anyone > > interested in these pat

Re: llvm/clang packages

2025-04-11 Thread Jeremy Drake via Cygwin-apps
On Thu, 10 Apr 2025, Jeremy Drake wrote: > We (@mati865 and I) just managed to get llvm/clang 20.1.2 building and > targeting Cygwin over at MSYS2, and I was wondering if you had anyone > interested in these patches to update the package(s) in Cygwin? I'm not > particularly interested in taking o