Williams, Gerald S (Jerry) wrote:
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
At the risk of being over-obvious, Linux users... use Linux. In such
an insular environment, perhaps they have the luxury of only using
the One True Text File Format (whatever that is).
We're you the one who brought up Unicode earlier
Ring, Patrick wrote:
I am having a problem with the "source" command in bash (3.1-9).
When I try to source a file with aliases in it, the aliases get garbled
so that they don't work. When I type "alias" on the command line, I can
see that it is incorrect. Other commands also do not work, usuall
Dave Korn wrote:
On 05 October 2006 08:52, Tom Lee wrote:
is there a way to mount /cygdrive/c as /?
by default, c:/cygwin is mounted as /.
I really like the feature of "ls /" to display evevrything under c:/
If that's *really* what you want, i.e. you want all your unix/linux-style
usr, lib
Peter Jay Salzman wrote:
There are 4 blank lines in my .bash_profile:
[snip]
Each blank line generates an error:
$ source .bash_profile
BEGIN ~/.bash_profile
: command not found
: command not found
: command not found
: command not found
END ~/.bash_profile
However, if I c
I've been keeping up with the new make, bash, etc, on my own desktop,
but I'd like to try updating our build machine's packages to see if we
can get some speed out of the new bash release. However, this being a
build machine, breaking it would be *bad*.
I *want* to say I can downgrade (not uni
Mike Marchywka wrote:
Thanks, I've been on the list before and I do recall some related
success stories. Any suggestions for a more appropriate audience?
Since your question (which I read, after skimming through to find it at
the bottom of your post) seems to relate generically to scripting, m
Sean McNamara wrote:
Hi all,
I've been trying to resolve this for over a week, and there hasn't
been a peep from the list. That has me wondering if:
1. Nobody has the slightest idea about what could be happening.
2. The solution is so painfully obvious that folks don't feel it
warrants a resp
Sean McNamara wrote:
Thanks for your response Matthew. I have attached my
cygcheck output this time.
Um... ok, we got it the first two times, you can stop posting it now. :-)
Sorry for not doing that initially. Most mailing lists I
subscribe to do not allow attachments, so I didn't think
Linda Walsh wrote:
Eric Blake wrote:
For example, it may just be a matter of figuring out which scripts
have DOS line endings but reside on binary mounts.
---
What was changed recently? Was it that the old, line-read
functions quietly removed CR's so bash (et al.) wouldn't see
them even on
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Mark Charney ieee.org> writes:
I suspect I'm missing some "rights". This is an issue for me
on multiple machines running Windows Server 2003 x64 or for
32b WinXP.
When I try to compile using the debug-option (/Zi) to the
Microsoft Visual Studio Pro 2005 compil
DePriest, Jason R. wrote:
On 10/10/06, Tim Beuman <> wrote:
I still have problems with ssh-agent/ssh-add when I install McAfee.
Browsing over the internet didn't yield a working solution. Before I
could stop McAfee and it would work but with the latest version of
McAfee (version 10?) disabling M
Tim Beuman wrote:
Hi Jason,
The "Ridiculous amount of stuff" was sent out as atachments but I guess
somehow it ended up inline. Sorry for that.
Um... Huh. Thunderbird shows it as attachment. The web archive does not.
Anyone that knows the mailer software have a guess what went wrong?
--
Ma
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
mwoehlke wrote:
Tim Beuman wrote:
Hi Jason,
The "Ridiculous amount of stuff" was sent out as atachments but I
guess somehow it ended up inline. Sorry for that.
Um... Huh. Thunderbird shows it as attachment. The web archive does
not. Anyone that knows
Tim Beuman wrote:
Matthew,
There is a line "Content-Disposition: inline" which causes the
attachments to be shown inline. Could be the file-type that causes
Thunderbird to add this line to the section header. I will check if I
can convince Thunderbird to not include this line when sending .tx
Dave Korn wrote:
... although I can see problems arising when someone uses mount to rename the
cygdrive mount. Maybe it would be worth providing a notation that means
'cygdrive, no matter how it may have been renamed.
Hmm, how about /dev/fs/? ;-)
--
Matthew
Will your shell have salvation? Onl
201 - 215 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
