cygwin bash 2.05b patches and "rebash" a debugger for bash (http://bashdb.sourceforge.net)

I've been working on a modified version of bash 2.05b which has better support for error reporting and debugging (it also has a timestamped history). It also has a somewhat complete debugger modeled off of gdb using the additional support. See http://bashdb.sourceforge.net for info. I've noticed t

Re: cygwin bash 2.05b patches and "rebash" a debugger for bash (http://bashdb.sourceforge.net)

Corinna Vinschen writes: > Using the bash source package from the Cygwin distro might help. The source does not contain patches or diffs. Are there patches stored separately from source? What happens when a new release comes out? (Debian patches are nicely bundled for each particular problem and

Re: cygwin bash 2.05b patches and "rebash" a debugger for bash (http://bashdb.sourceforge.net)

Corinna Vinschen writes: > I have just ran that diff since I'm passing over bash maintainership > to Ronald Landheer-Cieslak. Actually, I ran it myself yesterday and applied the cygwin-oriented patches which are very few (but they were different and therefore probably better than the on-the-fly

Re: cygwin bash 2.05b patches and "rebash" a debugger for bash (http://bashdb.sourceforge.net)

This is all a bit too cryptic for me. Ronald Landheer-Cieslak writes: > The patches that have not been applied yet will be applied in the next > release. Whose release? If you are talking about a cygwin release, yes, I'd imagine one would want to put in public patches that are missing :-) As