Dear all,
I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
I tried to install ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm (see:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables/blast+/LATEST/ ) into
Cygwin 1.7.13 with the command "install -i
On 2012-4-7 16:12, marco atzeri wrote:
On 4/7/2012 9:40 AM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
I tried to install ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm (see:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
On 2012-4-8 14:47, marco atzeri wrote:
On 4/8/2012 5:10 AM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-7 16:12, marco atzeri wrote:
Thanks, Marco. I was not trying to run a native linux apps, and instead
tried to rebuild the app from source. The BLAST software provides the
Build.sh and Check.sh scripts
On 2012-4-10 8:30, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
De-Jian Zhao sent the following at Monday, April 09, 2012 11:12 AM
On 4/8/2012 5:10 AM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-7 16:12, marco atzeri wrote:
Thanks, Marco. I was not trying to run a native linux apps, and instead
tried to
It seems that the compilation under Cygwin is more complicated than
expected.
Thank you for your explanation, Warren.
On 2012-4-10 8:49, Warren Young wrote:
On 4/9/2012 9:12 AM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
the compilation
always stopped at "checking python" even after python was installed.
On 2012-4-17 13:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Dear all,
I noticed that there is a command - rpm - under Cygwin 1.7. Does that
mean RPM packages can be installed into Cygwin?
I tried to install ncbi-blast-2.2.26+-3.i686.rpm (see:
ftp://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/executables
On 2012-4-18 22:03, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 09:13:20PM +0800, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-17 13:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
[snip]
Thank you, Linda. When I saw the error message after installing some
packages to satisfy the dependencies, I was wondering why the rpm
On 2012-4-19 0:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Thank you, Linda. When I saw the error message after installing some
packages to satisfy the dependencies, I was wondering why the rpm
package still complained about the already installed packages. I was
not aware that cygwin and
On 2012-4-19 1:08, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 12:05:38AM +0800, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-18 22:03, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 09:13:20PM +0800, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-17 13:58, Linda Walsh wrote:
[snip]
Thank you, Linda. When I saw
On 2012-4-19 7:09, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
De-Jian,
Hello. It's me again.
I suspect that just writing wrapper scripts would be faster than playing
with RPMs and/or trying to compile blast yourself.
As I understand it, blast programs are all command-line. I think
that the eas
Hi,
When I type "cyg" and Tab, many executables starting with "cyg" are
listed (Display all 262 possibilities? (y or n) y). I find that many of
them are *.dll libraries under /usr/bin/. This is inconvenient to find
the real executable applications (*.exe). Since *.dll files are only
libraries
On 2012-4-20 21:02, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Hi,
When I type "cyg" and Tab, many executables starting with "cyg" are
listed (Display all 262 possibilities? (y or n) y). I find that many
of them are *.dll libraries under /usr/bin/. This is inconvenient to
find the real exe
On 2012-4-20 21:07, Václav Zeman wrote:
On 20 April 2012 15:02, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Hi,
When I type "cyg" and Tab, many executables starting with "cyg" are listed
(Display all 262 possibilities? (y or n) y). I find that many of them are
*.dll libraries under /usr/bin/. Thi
On 2012-4-21 0:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 21 00:17, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-20 21:07, Václav Zeman wrote:
On 20 April 2012 15:02, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Hi,
When I type "cyg" and Tab, many executables starting with "cyg" are listed
(Display all 262 possibili
On 2012-4-21 1:29, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 4/20/2012 1:25 PM, Nellis, Kenneth wrote:
From: Corinna Vinschen
Windows requires the x bit for DLLs to be loadable as executable code
into the address space of a process. As Václav wrote, it's a Windows
thing.
So, I had to play with "chmod -x
On 2012-4-21 1:40, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 4/20/2012 1:32 PM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-21 0:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 21 00:17, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-20 21:07, Václav Zeman wrote:
On 20 April 2012 15:02, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
Hi,
When I type "cyg" and
On 2012-4-21 1:57, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 4/20/2012 1:47 PM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-21 1:40, Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 4/20/2012 1:32 PM, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-21 0:27, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Apr 21 00:17, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
On 2012-4-20 21:07, Václav Zeman
On 2012-4-21 3:06, Jon TURNEY wrote:
On 20/04/2012 14:02, De-Jian Zhao wrote:
When I type "cyg" and Tab, many executables starting with "cyg" are listed
(Display all 262 possibilities? (y or n) y). I find that many of them are
*.dll libraries under /usr/bin/. This is inco
18 matches
Mail list logo
