Support for DWARF-2 debug info?

2003-01-03 Thread Dave Hooper
I've looked in the archives for this and several other lists and cannot find a definitive answer. Can someone tell me: a) If the cygwin build of gcc/gdb/gas/etc supports DWARF-2 debug information (it appears not but I may be overlooking something) b) If not, is it just a matter of #defining the

Re: Re: help for compiling problem!

2003-01-06 Thread Dave Hooper
>>>error: main.c: undefined reference to '_setlinebuf' >> > cygwin doesn't provide setlinebuf. > In general what this means is that you have to actually "inspect" the > code and "port it" As a follow up to this, and the earlier thread regarding icmp (which presumably is resolved in the same way),

Re: Re: help for compiling problem!

2003-01-06 Thread Dave Hooper
>>As a follow up to this, and the earlier thread regarding icmp (which >>presumably is resolved in the same way), would it not be "better" to add >>support for the icmp function and setlinebuf to cygwin? > > What are you suggesting? That there should be an eager team of > engineers standing by wai

Re: General comments...

2003-01-08 Thread Dave Hooper
> I'm on a P4 2.64Ghz/512 DDR-RAM/Over 100Gb HD Space and it's slow for me > ;-) I do like the the idea of a prograss dialog when setup is reading the > packages from lcoal disk though. The major spot I've noticed with slowness is when if you click on the text "Default" in the packages list (initi

Re: Setup.exe

2003-01-08 Thread Dave Hooper
>>> Isn't that kinda up to the user. When you finish downloading new >>> packages you kill your internet connection as cygwin setup won't >>> need it. > > Autodialling isn't something that (most) programs do. Windows does it for > them. So setup doesn't know if a connection was made on it's account

Re: Problem going from .o -> .dll

2003-01-08 Thread Dave Hooper
> $ ./driver.exe > EOF > g(smiley face)Err: Close failed This is not a forum for debugging other peoples' code, but ... 1. You are using HANDLE * instead of HANDLE 2. Your logic for nul termination is totally wrong: c->buffer[nBytesRead + 1] = '\0'; should be c->buffer[nBytesRe

RE: Setup.exe

2003-01-09 Thread Dave Hooper
> Maybe I was a bit unclear here; I'm "always" doing other stuff while > the/any download proceeds in the background. I'd still like to be > notified(sp) about it having finished, in a sane manner - so I can go on > typing (or whatever)... > NOTE THE PROBLEM: Do not pop up an ACTIVE dialog; I woul

Re: Explorer Shell shortcuts with a DOS shell

2003-01-15 Thread Dave Hooper
You know what I would do? I'd write a tiny .exe (for Win32) wrapper around cmd.exe and use that to execute your .bat which in turn spawns bash, etc. Why? Because as far as I know there's no way to instruct a shortcut to 'run hidden' (you can run Minimized, though). So, if the command shell windo

Re: Non-zero VMA's w/DWARF-2?

2003-01-15 Thread Dave Hooper
I've been informed (though maybe erroneously?) that djgpp supports DWARF-2 so maybe that would be a resonable starting point for investigation? > From: "Brian Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I am trying to add DWARF-2 support to Cygwin. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-sim

Re: Bug in rm -r with locked files

2003-01-22 Thread Dave Hooper
> Yea yea yea - I know I know. I'm just bitchen to bitch. Problem is already > solved - MS del works just fine - it's just "Kludgy" is all. You're not the 'washerite' Brian Kelly by any chance? d -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cyg

Re: ftp server showing date as part of the file/directory name

2003-01-28 Thread Dave Hooper
> When I log in to the ftp server from a win32 client such as ws_ftp, the > file and directory names include the dates as part of the actual name. This can happen if the group and/or user name has spaces in it - the de-facto directory listing format for FTP assumes a fixed number of fields and wil

Re: ftp server showing date as part of the file/directory name

2003-01-28 Thread Dave Hooper
> hi Dave, > > you were right - my group is "Domain Users", so a line from 'ls' looks > like > > -rw-rw-rw-1 rsiklos Domain U 23 Jan 23 16:18 .bashrc > > any way to solve this problem without changing group? Far as I'm aware, nope. For maximum compatible across OSs, usernames and group