your good fortune,
only hoping that you will compensate me in a way that you feel is just and
warranted.
Of course I trust you will keep this information STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL ;-)
Brian Kelly
"Steve Fairbairn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 06/04/2003
10:28:58 AM
Sent by
"True Vim'ers DO NOT navigate with arrow keys". I remember reading that
somewhere. Certainly
the "correct" way to navigate in Vim is with the H J K and L keys.
Understood, acknowledged,
yaddy yadda yaaa. That said - I "like" to use the arrow keys. It's habitual
and something I've been
doing f
TERM setting. Since I'm not
qualified to give you a gold star, I'll simply pledge my "support" give you
my promise
to cast a ballot for you if a "gold star" referendum were ever held. ( hmmm, I
can't remember if I'm registered to vote! )
Brian Kelly
&quo
s
according to setup
instructions circa 2000-2001. They may still be - I don't know, haven't
looked. Anyhow,
do you know offhand if there is still any compelling reason to have tty in
the Cygwin
environment variable?
Thanks again.
Brian Kelly
( You're level of "meanness" gets only
is the determiner. I must be losing it - I "thought" I had closed
all open cmd windows and
opened a new one after updating the .profile - but - alas - that probably
is not what actually
happened.
Brian Kelly
"Shankar Unni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 06/10
there something I can change to fix this? For AIX or MS 2000?
Brian Kelly
"WellChoice, Inc." made the following
annotations on 06/14/2003 06:28:23 AM
--
Attention! This electronic message contains i
uhhh - that's "MR CHRIST" to you sir. Yes OF COURSE I telnet to my
servers. I do so inside a secure network from desktops that are locked
down tighter than gold in Swiss Banks. Since I don't have every little
thing browser enabled on my servers, and IT has not seen fit to
distribute Putty to every
ble with Cygwin. And of course, unless
someone "knows" the "simple" solution above - they are outta luck. Of
course brain surgery is "simple" if you know how to do it. So why isn't
it fixed yet??
BWAM
I understand, really I do ;-)
BK
-Original Message---
elay - but the install - given
my experience - WILL "eventually" finish correctly.
Brian Kelly
"Dan Hatton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 06/16/2003 11:14:46
AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:cygwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WT
nity questioned
first followed by a week of hazing and then a month of silence.
By then you should have solved the issue and provided a patch.
Finally, I leave you with this directive:
Cygwin - use it and SHUT UP.
Thank you!
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ok
would probably not be a waste of someone's time - as more and more
"non-code-heads"
(like moi) are using cygwin with each passing day.
Brian Kelly
"Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 06/26/2003 03:21:46
PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
re only gonna get more frequent
and more vocal as time goes on.
So for those who get a little bent when someone complains about the lack of
"wizards" and "plug and play",
the fact is, such rabble wouldn't even be singing if cygwin wasn't first
and foremost AN OUTRAGEOUS SUCCES
>> Why rewrite 'su' to do those types of tricks, when 'ssh' already exists?
Uhhh - how about "script portability??"
(Which is why I predict su will "someday" be made to do this. When??
Simple,
When somebody does it .... ) [ I ain't demand
uot;
>
> (Which is why I predict su will "someday" be made to do this. When??
> Simple,
> When somebody does it ) [ I ain't demand'in nothin from nobody ]
>
> Brian Kelly
>
>
> "Karsten M. Self" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 0
ings like "old"
resource kits - or at the very least, moving it around and making it a
ROYAL PAIN to find.
I hate going to MS for anything - it just plain SUCKS. Plus I have no idea
how well MS su even works with cygwin. Have you used the two together??
Brian Kelly
"Brian
#x27;n nothin! Whoever you are, and no matter where life finds
you - your patch will be ready before mine!
Brian Kelly
"Tremaine Floyd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 07/06/2003 08:00:21
PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Ke
way, if it
now works - I'll smile.
"Cygwin" - comes with a lifetime "money back guarantee" if not satisfied
for any reason! ;-)
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 07/06/2003 08:37:15
PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I work in a large corporation with an obsessive security staff. Cygwin
is
now "accepted" (unofficially) through the "grease gun" method. In WWII
one Nazi gunmaker was developing the world's first assault weapon.
Hitler
was informed of the effort - deemed it a waste of resources and ordered
the
proj
- I AM a lawyer. (Member of the Michigan Bar Association in
Good Standing).
Brian Kelly
"Robert Collins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 07/28/2003 07:26:26
AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:GP
could not find /tmp, please create!
GNU bash, version 2.05b.0(2)-release (i686-pc-cygwin)
Copyright (C) 2002 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
bash-2.05b$
_
SEEMS LIKE AN OPEN AND SHUT CASE TO ME!
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTEC
I STRONGLY advise that you do so with the
assistance
of an experienced counselor.
Brian Kelly, J.D.
"Jonathan Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 07/28/2003 07:01:18 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"Max Bowsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTEC
d recipient's of such
an executable NEED to know about it's contents, the licensing restrictions
of those contents, and
prohibitions of duplicating the bundled executable without satisfying ALL
licensing restrictions of ALL
its contents - INCLUDING the distribution of source for any and a
nstall created
binary (or "archive"
if one so pleases) itself. Of course anyone who creates their own floppy
for their own use is exempted.
Brian Kelly
"Jonathan Clark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 07/29/2003 12:47:59 PM
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[
netd, and start inetd
again, and telnet
again works flawlessly.
Anybody got a clue what I'm missing here?
Brian Kelly
"WellChoice, Inc." made the following
annotations on 08/01/2003 08:12:43 AM
--
Atten
#x27;ll be anxious to see
if this was
indeed the one indispensible thing I needed to do.
Again - appreciate all the assistance. I need xinetd to maximize security
until we can
get secure shell working from the mainframe (don't hold your breath!).
Ah well, some folks just like liv'in in
that keep
cyg*win*
from working - all along *denying* it's a cyg*win* problem .
Interesting how a 'Great' mind works ;-) .
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 01:56:16
PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Se
h the *meanness* here is small price to
pay to get the answers I frequently need.
"Jim Drash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 04:18:16 PM
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and c
hy I wasn't able to get it
> working on my own.
>
> The one thing of course that I would never have thought to do
> would be to
> copy
> and modify sshd to xinetd. Not exactly *intuitive*! I'll be
> anxious to see
> if this was
> indeed the one indispensible thing I
I could log on with local id's - but not with Domain id's. Is proftpd
set up to do domain authentication via ntsec??
If not, is there an ETA?
Brian Kelly
"WellChoice, Inc." made the following
annotations on 08/08/2003 05:35:21 PM
--
;-)
bk
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/08/2003 11:13:02
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
On Fri,
ff working on 2003 Server. Could it be that 2000 server and
2003 server really
aren't all that different??
Anyway, before I saddle you guys with "stuff", I thought I'd first ask if
*anyone* is using
it successfully on 2000 *Server*.
Brian Kelly
"WellChoice, Inc."
AIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 02:58:10 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Gosh, isn't there a *win* in *cygwin*?? Not that I'm "dema
r nearly nine months.
RAMpage => http://www.jfitz.com/software/RAMpage/
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 11:40:57
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc
hink more
feedback
and experience from a wider cross section of folks would be needed first.
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/08/2003 11:15:36
AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECT
s happened to break ftp or can suggest
what other things I can investigate
to get the bottom of this problem Id REALLY appreciate it.
Brian Kelly
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation
he upgrade. All the ftp's I did, I did from a local bash
shell - which works
just fine.
Of course none of this "proves" that the problem lies with new cygwin code.
If anyone running
NT 4.0 SP 6 could try to recreate the problem as described above - that
would be a big help.
Brian Kel
96 Dec 8 20:36 provider
drwxrwxrwt4 bmk1n0 None 4096 Dec 8 20:33 servlets
-rwxrwxrwx1 bmk1n0 None 12984320 Dec 8 20:42 static.tar
drwxrwxrwt 3 bmk1n0 None0 Dec 8 20:33 web
ftp>
Brian Kelly
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTE
es an
rm memory leak. I tested it a couple of days ago and YEP - it's still there!!!
Brian Kelly
###
> memory leak? (was: 1.3.9: "fork: Permission denied" (Windows 2000))
> From: "Reddie, Steven"
> To: c
covered with either attrib or
chmod xxx * and then the
script can continue. But in order for that to happen, there has to be an
ERROR MSG - something
I can get from the MS del cmd - even though I'd rather use rm. It's all
lost on me ...
Brian Kelly
"Randall R Schulz" <[EM
r Unni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 01/21/2003 02:47:54
PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"'Max Bowsher'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:RE: Bug in rm -r with locked files
Max corrected me:
ou get done laying off my co-worker? OH
... OKAY!
Brian Kelly
"Steve Fairbairn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 01/22/2003
03:57:00 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:RE: Bug in rm -r with locked
g a feeloading good-for-nothing ingrate - I say this:
THANK YOU
THANK YOU
THANK YOU 1000
THANK YOU X 1000
There ... feel better?
Hmmm ... though not ...
; - )
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 01/22/2003 10:38:02 AM
ourse - will such people read the FAQ "BEFORE" bothering the busy
folks on this list
NOT!!!!!
Brian Kelly
PS (One can also use cmd /c to run CYGWIN utilities - even something
like
cmd /c start cmd /c rm -rf * which will run as separate process
enabling you to return to t
Does this mean that Cygwin is not ready for production??
Darn!! and I was just getting ready to roll it out to my biggest
client - Randy's Pizza and Bait. ( sorry - not realation )
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf
Of Rand
My expertise is in Perl - and
there it shall remain. I spent a couple hours a few weeks ago trying to
incorporate strace into the mix I run, but it turned out to be a really
complicated undertaking - so I gave up on it. So I apologize for
effectively offering nothing more than a BIG "me too!!&q
n down and around year ten, the legislature voted to fund the
construction of his library - allocating close to TWO MILLION DOLLARS
for the effort.
As for your *mean* response serving as a deterrent - your ongoing rant
about not wanting to hear from non-contributors is just that - ongoing
...
October 31, 2003 1:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cygwin deadlocks due to broken select() when writing to
pipes
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 12:59:17AM -0500, Brian Kelly wrote:
>Nevertheless, a few persistent reminders over a long period can have
>the same effect as a very large number
> and my son would have a telephone in his room.
Do you have a cordless phone? - Then your son has *already* had a phone
in his room!
> If this technique was uniformly useful then we'd have peace in the
Middle > East
Persistence has to be uniform, consistent, morally obvious, concretely
defined
Will the next cygwin1.dll release have cgf's select() fix? And when is the
next version planned for release?
(I know a snap-shot is available).
Brian Kelly
"WellChoice, Inc." made the following
annotations on 11/14/2
" answer?
BK
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com
on 11/14/2003 02:13:45 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Will next cygwin1.dll release ha
>@cygwin.com
on 11/14/2003 03:13:28 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Will next cygwin1.dll release have the select() fix?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 02:10:53PM -0600, Brian For
Why do I feel like I'm watching an Ed Wood movie?
Thank God you guys write better code than you do comedy.
Suggested ad copy for "attracting" more non-contributing end-users:
Cygwin! - Come for the software, stay for the BERATEMENT!
:-l
bits and bytes may break my code, but your 'word's will n
/it?
;-D
-bk
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com
on 11/15/2003 02:11:20 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Will next cygwin1.dll release have t
> Anyway, can we *please* just drop this noise now.
Agreed - enough.
> I'll gladly relinquish it if it'll make you feel better.
HECK NO!! cgf doesn't give those out every day - and besides, in my not
so humble opinion you've contributed MORE than enough to deserve one
outside of this *noise* - a
test version of
cygwin/gcc. If someone can see a quick fix - or work around - to this it
would obviously be a BIG help and be much appreciated.
Brian Kelly
cpan> install IPC::Semaphore
R
unning install for module IPC::Semaphore
Running make for G/GB/GBARR/IPC-SysV-1.03.tar.gz
CPAN: Digest::MD5 load
Oops!! My goof - I meant Win32::Semaphore. DOH!
-bk
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 11/15/2003 05:10:54 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:cpan/gcc cannot compile perl module after cygwin 1.5*
Before the upgrade
I guess my first question, is
there backward compatibilty? And, if there is, how can I invoke it for
successful compilation? Also - any hope that the default installation will
ever again compile this, or is there now a need for a Win64::Semaphore
module?
Brian Kelly
- make
cp Semaphore.pm blib/lib/Wi
Before you go "do-o-o-o-o-o-o-own" - can you release 1.5.6?
I'm waiting. ;-)
Brian Kelly
aka: cgf's first ever *Black Hole* recipient (If he were to give out such
a thing).
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com
on 12/17/2003 0
g I just swap it out. I do
nightly incremental backups to an external hard disk via USB2 and
NovaBack.
You should SERIOUSLY consider something similar - if you can swing it.
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Christopher Fayl
dy? ;-)( Anyone wanting
another Gold Star - feel free to sarcastically answer this question for
Chris! )
Regards,
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com
on 01/19/2004 10:56:41 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
T
Used setup.exe to backed out to 1.5.5-1, rebooted - and Vim is back to
full functionality.
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com
on 01/19/2004 10:56:41 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED
ss hanging problems I've been
having since the dawn of time have *suddenly* disappeared! I have yet
to fully determine if I can dispense with RAMpage, but so far things look
VERY encouraging.
Once again I'd like to thank cgf, Corrina, Igor, and all other
contributor's for their e
s all).
Brian Kelly
"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 01/24/2004 10:13:22 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: I post NOT to condemn cgf ...
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 BrianKellyEmpirebluecom wrote:
their told anything else.
Brian Kelly
"Steven Hartland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 01/27/2004
09:43:35 AM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:cygwin processes and system'ed processes using 100% C
"Brian Dessent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 02/02/2004 01:10:44 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:"'Cygwin List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Plausibility of sendmail?
>> If your intent is to use Windows+Cygwin+sendmail as a pr
n distribution is something I would
understand, and probably support (as long as there are advertised
alternatives of course!)
Brian Kelly
"Brian Dessent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 02/02/2004 09:33:56 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECT
> Andrew DeFaria wrote:
> If they are so clueless as you suggest then one has to wonder why you
> tell them that you're running a Linux OS and using sendmail?!?
They "know" that Linux is *open source* and *dangerous* - because that's
what the VERY political Server Team (who have sold out to Micr
- but unfortunately I
don't a suitible test environment available at the moment. )
( BURNING QUESTION - Are *THANK YOU's* from non-contributors ...
off - topic??? )
Brian Kelly
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire
The answer to this question was of such profound and ineffable
importance that it earned the distinguished Mr. Brian Ford a GOLD STAR
for his brilliant, luminous exposition of cgf's sagacious guiding
principles.
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-11/msg00601.html
The forever humbled,
Brian
more thing to be aware of.
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Thorsten Kampe
Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 7:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Running cygwin cron under WinXP SP1
* Russell Hind (2004-02-19 10:55 +0100
hat being the case,
Cygwin perl *thinks* its
running on unix - not Win32. Therefore, modules that expect direct,
non-POSIX access to the
Win32 subsystem are gonna need some help that wouldn't otherwise be
necessary with a true
Win32 build of Perl.
Brian Kelly
"WellChoice, Inc." ma
someday finished - maybe they too will be inspired to
*up the ante*. And I for one completely understand their lack of desire
for doing it *now*.
Brian Kelly
"WellChoice, Inc." made the following
annotations on 02/19/2004 03:41:10 PM
--
://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00716.html
And if that seems a little vague and non-commital (much less helpful),
given that it's only February, you can ponder this:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2004-02/msg00714.html
Brian Kelly
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[
I got this *System Error* message in my e-mail:
> *plonk*
> Ahh...
> cgf
I'm concerned that creator might be dropping some critical data.
However someone more knowledgeable in these matters will have debug
this.
I also don't have a 64 sheet test roll installed in my bat
eans
he
is now powerless in this regard) or Corrinna should give him one!
Brian Kelly
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Hi Jay,
My name is Brian Kelly, and I've been working with your Net::Telnet module
for over 4
years. First I'd like to say THANKS It's been a fabulous tool for me - as
I'm sure it has for
thousands upon thousands of folks around the globe.
Lately I've b
by doing
chown -R SYSTEM:Administrators /var
That essentially fixed it.
Futhermore, it was *not* necessary to have to provide any further user
rights to the SYSTEM id.
It is working in "inetd" mode.
Brian Kelly
"Jason Tishler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com
- perhaps it has fixes
for this?
Brian Kelly
"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/08/2003 06:50:16 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: proftpd issues
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wro
can see, the server runs with this ID, and authenticates this ID,
but
not Domain ID's.
Also, it simply will *not* run with the SYSTEM ID, although telnetd *is*
running
with it.
Thanks
Brian Kelly
"Igor Pechtchanski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 08/08/2003 08:57:53 PM
Pleas
BK
"Andrew DeFaria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 11:28:18 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, I can't fee
entry:
**MYLOGINID**:unused_by_nt/2000/xp:48479:10513:Brian
Kelly,U-**DOMAIN**\**MYLOGINID**,S-1-5-21-15
-888547495-1093625069-38479://**REMOTESERVERNAME**/users/**MYLOGINID**:/bin/bash
Connected to **SERVERNAME**.**DOMAINNAME**.com.
220 ProFTPD 1.2.9rc1 Server (ProFTPD Default Installation
patient.
Cluelessly yours,
BK
( PS - I HATE Windows - put I get paid 'quite well' to work on it, and
given the current state
of the economy - I think I'll keep working on it . )
"Andrew DeFaria" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 06:24:26 PM
Sent
on 08/07/2003 10:48:57
PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:44:11AM +0200, Luc Hermitte wrote:
>* On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:2
-- Forwarded by Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire on 08/07/2003
10:07 PM ---
Brian Kelly
08/07/2003 10:06 PM
To:"Luc Hermitte" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak (Document link: Brian Kelly)
*You'r
sting.
Brian Kelly
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@cygwin.com on 08/07/2003 12:52:53 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: Win2k and cygwin memory leak
Now seems to be a good time for me to jump in.
I can DEFINITIVELY say
or is there some configuration thing I
have to do??
Brian Kelly
"WellChoice, Inc." made the following
annotations on 08/18/2003 03:08:03 PM
--
Attention! This electronic message contains information that
thing else - I would *really* like to know at least, if anyone else
gets the same behavior.
That would at least establish that I'm dealing with a legitimate bug rather
than a setup
or configuration issue. Just a "me too" - or "works for me" would be MUCH
appreciated.
Bria
- something to feel *good* about. ;-)
Brian Kelly
"Elfyn McBratney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/20/2003 08:50:43 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Re: No
ions (like this one)
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2003-08/msg00440.html
Enjoy,
Brian Kelly
(Oh - and yes - the error messages *SUCK* - obviously created for the
developers use and *not* end-users. A big PET PEEVE of mine - the
developer's ultimate revenge against the dreaded
mkpasswd -d -u
Brian Kelly
"Doug Jenkinson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/22/2003 01:48:16 PM
Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Brian Kelly/WTC1/Empire)
Subject:Cygwin & Domain Users
Hi All,
I recently got a new lapto
cgf seems to think that working himself to death gives him the right to be
the *meanest* person on the list!
... hmmm ... GUESS IT DOES ;-)
Thanks!
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com on 08/31/2003 02:41:43
AM
Please respond to
*Kisses and flower petals* ;-) for cgf, Corrina, Igor, Elfyn, and all the
rest who helped make this happen!!!
Brian Kelly
Brian Kelly
08/20/2003 08:56 AM
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: No output from DOS commands via telnet using xinetd
(Document link: Brian Kelly
>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2004 at 02:26:49PM -0700, Lex Ein wrote:
>> http://www.cygwin.com/snapshots/
>> "Cygwin Interim Snapshots"
>> Whoo, racy.
>> Guess I missed the party.
> Ok, ok. I added a subtitle to the snapshot page to make it's true nature
> more obvious.
> cgf
First of all - where's the
Borrowing a line from that deeply inspirational film ...
ANIMAL HOUSE:
"THANK YOU SIR - MAY I HAVE ANOTHER!!??"
The efforts of all involved are GREATLY appreciated!
Brian Kelly
"Christopher Faylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@cygwin.com
on 09/05/2004 12:51:25 AM
This would be "more" helpful:
Do you want to not skip the package (No/Yes/Maybe)?
The "Maybe" can then consult a random number routine to decide whether or not
to do the operation.
-Original Message-
>From: Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Jul 16, 2007 11:52 AM
>To: cygwin@
11134 ~
$
-Original Message-
>From: Corinna Vinschen
>Sent: Aug 21, 2010 3:29 PM
>To: cygwin@cygwin.com
>Subject: Re: 1.7.6-1: mount -p and mount --show-cygdrive-prefix broken in
>latest release
>
>On Aug 21 15:17, Brian Kelly wrote:
>> I have a script that relies o
which was fine by me so I
continued. Apparently something "fell down" in that whole train of events, and
when the reboot later occurred, the cygwin1.dll must not have been actually
replaced. I'll let you know if the re-install fixes things.
-Original Message-
>From: B
ocesses and services BEFORE running setup.exe. Otherwise ...
"your mileage may vary" ...
-Original Message-
>From: Brian Kelly
>Sent: Aug 21, 2010 3:18 PM
>To: cygwin@cygwin.com
>Subject: Re: 1.7.6-1: mount -p and mount --show-cygdrive-prefix broken in
>late
98 matches
Mail list logo
