Re: 64bit lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz - Empty

2017-04-07 Thread Jon Turney
On 04/04/2017 18:19, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2017-04-04 12:03, cyg Simple wrote: On 4/4/2017 9:04 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 04/04/2017 14:43, cyg Simple wrote: Exactly but the binary install of lapack should require liblapack-devel and liblapack0. I disagree. It will not happen for my p

Re: 64bit lapack-3.7.0-1.tar.xz - Empty

2017-04-07 Thread cyg Simple
On 4/7/2017 7:44 AM, Jon Turney wrote: > On 04/04/2017 18:19, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-04-04 12:03, cyg Simple wrote: >>> On 4/4/2017 9:04 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 04/04/2017 14:43, cyg Simple wrote: > > Exactly but the binary install of lapack should require > liblapac