Hi,
I'm running into a strange problem. On my PC (a quad core i5), Xwin.exe takes
(in combination with svchost.exe) 25% average CPU load. Stopping xwin.exe, also
reduces the load to almost zero (if I'm not doing anything else). The load is
mainly on 2 CPUs (almost 50% on both) and 10% on the ot
> >> > Hello all, I'm new to this and I successfully build a package with
> >> > cygport. My problem is that, I would like to install it in order to
> >> > test if the package was successfully built. Is there anyway to do
> >> > that?
> >>
> >> https://cygwin.com/package-server.html
> >
> > I usual
Right now, libxml2 version 2.9.4 has a bug
(https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766834) that causes perl
XML::LibXML to fail to install
(https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=114638). Because of this, I
need to ensure my team keeps the previous version 2.9.3. In order to ensur
Thank you very much Andrew!
It was very helpful. Thank you for all your help :)
Best regards,
Rui
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Andrew Schulman
wrote:
>> >> > Hello all, I'm new to this and I successfully build a package with
>> >> > cygport. My problem is that, I would like to install it in
Rui Pedro Caldeira writes:
> Hello all, I'm new to this and I successfully build a package with
> cygport. My problem is that, I would like to install it in order to
> test if the package was successfully built. Is there anyway to do
> that?
Yes, you can point setup to a local directory. It must
Andrew Schulman writes:
>> On 3/15/2017 6:37 AM, Rui Pedro Caldeira wrote:
>> > Hello all, I'm new to this and I successfully build a package with
>> > cygport. My problem is that, I would like to install it in order to
>> > test if the package was successfully built. Is there anyway to do
>> > tha
[Sorry, forgot to reply-all...]
Am 15.03.2017 um 23:48 schrieb Jeffrey Walton:
Since Coverity is
complaining about an implicit conversion, maybe the following will
help to avoid the implicit part (and sidestep the finding):
if (free != NULL)
break;
Or perhaps:
if ((void*)free
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Your email
message was not delivered to the intended recipients because malware was
detected.
--- Additional Information ---:
Subject: 52666 info
Sender: cygwin@cygwin.com
Time received: 3/16/2017 7:33:38 PM
Message ID:<14896928
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software. Your email
message was not delivered as is to the intended recipients because malware was
detected in one or more attachments included with it. All attachments were
deleted.
--- Additional Information ---:
Subject: 52666 kvu
Sen
On 03/15/2017 02:36 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
Do the local rebase on your build targets as detailed in my question
to Achim and his response. Rerun after any system change or build.
Alright, I think I've got it now, thank you. I'll experiment with it
first and then I'm guessing that this might
On 3/16/2017 11:28 AM, Kees Dekker wrote:
>
> I know, the above information is vague, but do anyone have a
> suggestion/suggestion how to find a root cause?
> Unfortunately, I don't know when this higher-than-expected CPU load occurred
> for the first time. The problem became somewhat more urgen
Going by subj and talk below, this is a bit confusing...
But it looks like you are testing 'free' for a value?
Isn't standard 'free' declared to take 1 arg and
return void?
If you aren't talking standard 'free()', then
nevermind...
Hans-Bernhard Bröker wrote:
[Sorry, forgot to reply-all...]
I noticed today that we don't have this package. I tried building it
from source with a './configure && make && make install'.
But when I run "sem" I get the following output:
1 [main] perl 7712 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed by
'Util.dll' (0x1E) is already occupied
1 [main]
Am 16.03.2017 um 22:46 schrieb L A Walsh:
Going by subj and talk below, this is a bit confusing...
But it looks like you are testing 'free' for a value?
Not really. The idea is to test free for _exixtence_. Which only makes
sense in case of weak symbol support getting involved. In other
s
On 3/16/2017 5:51 PM, Matt D. wrote:
I noticed today that we don't have this package. I tried building it
from source with a './configure && make && make install'.
But when I run "sem" I get the following output:
1 [main] perl 7712 child_info_fork::abort: address space needed by
'Util.dll' (0x1
On 2017-03-16 14:59, Daniel Santos wrote:
> On 03/15/2017 02:36 PM, Brian Inglis wrote:
>> Do the local rebase on your build targets as detailed in my question
>> to Achim and his response. Rerun after any system change or build.
>
> Alright, I think I've got it now, thank you. I'll experiment wit
16 matches
Mail list logo
