[ANNOUNCEMENT] GNOME 3.18.2

2015-12-02 Thread Yaakov Selkowitz
The following packages (and their respective subpackages) have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * abiword-3.0.1-5 * adwaita-icon-theme-3.18.0-1 * anjuta-3.18.2-1 * at-spi2-atk-2.18.1-1 * at-spi2-core-2.18.3-1 * atk1.0-2.18.0-1 * atkmm1.6-2.24.1-1 * atomix-3.18.0-1 * autoconf-archive-2015

Re: Setup suggestion: Check for running processes before uninstalling anything.

2015-12-02 Thread V.99
On 2.12.2015 0:11, Andrey Repin wrote: Greetings, All! I just got a hard case of stupidity... Started Cygwin setup before checking if anything is running Cygwin. Guess, what? It indeed did run. However, setup managed to uninstall mintty before telling me that there's ssh-pageant running in the b

Re: Incorrect Python errors when using os.remove to delete a directory

2015-12-02 Thread Adam Dinwoodie
On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 04:09:52PM +0100, Michael Wild wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2015 at 3:51 PM, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: > > If I use os.remove in Python to remove a directory, I expect it to fail > > with an OSError on Python2 or a IsADirectoryError on Python3. On > > Python2, I get OSError, but wi

Re: control-R broken in bash (__fzf_history__)

2015-12-02 Thread Keith Christian
> If you want to keep installing everything but want to maintain existing > Ctrl-R behaviour, your best bet is to explicitly bind Ctrl-R to the Bash > reverse-search function. You can do this by adding the following line > to your .bashrc, which (unless you're doing something odd) is executed > af

Re: [h-e-w] cygwin-64 2.3.1. bash fails when running under FSF emacs 24.5

2015-12-02 Thread Ken Brown
On 11/27/2015 2:31 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 22:20:18 +0100 From: Dominique de Waleffe So... started my homework... Got fresh w10 vm, put cygwin64 and both versions of emacs 24.4 and 24.5 from fsf ftp onto it And trying to start bash as shell fails under both version

libuv

2015-12-02 Thread Mr. Coin
Hi, Lots of project such as node.js or neovim are using libuv (https://github.com/libuv/libuv) which is incompatible with Cygwin. I've spent some time trying to build it, but I get issues with pthread. The wonderful Neovim project has several opened issues regarding the portability of libuv (http

Re: libuv

2015-12-02 Thread Tony Kelman
Lots of project such as node.js or neovim are using libuv (https://github.com/libuv/libuv) which is incompatible with Cygwin. I've spent some time trying to build it, but I get issues with pthread. The first compilation error you'll get will look like "unknown type name 'pthread_barrier_t'" but

Re: libuv

2015-12-02 Thread Warren Young
On Dec 2, 2015, at 12:32 PM, Mr. Coin wrote: > > Lots of project such as node.js or neovim are using libuv > which is incompatible with Cygwin. Why are you trying to stack two I/O abstraction layers? The whole point of libuv is that it lets you use the same code on *ix and Windows. Why do you

Re: fork issue when lauching cygwin64 process from 32bit native app on Windows 10 TH2

2015-12-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 1 22:44, David Macek wrote: > On 1. 12. 2015 18:40, David Macek wrote: > > On 1. 12. 2015 15:01, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >> On Dec 1 21:07, nu774 wrote: > There must be a bug in the new CMD somewhere. But, anyway, I'll look > into it when I finally managed to update my W10 tes

Re: fork issue when lauching cygwin64 process from 32bit native app on Windows 10 TH2

2015-12-02 Thread René Berber
On 12/2/2015 4:15 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > Along these lines, is anybody here still running a 64 bit Windows 10 > which has *NOT* been updated to 1511? If so, I just need the output > of a call to `cat /proc/self/maps' once for comparison. Under 64-bit Cygwin: $ cat /proc/self/maps 0001000

Re: fork issue when lauching cygwin64 process from 32bit native app on Windows 10 TH2

2015-12-02 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Dec 2 16:43, René Berber wrote: > On 12/2/2015 4:15 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > Along these lines, is anybody here still running a 64 bit Windows 10 > > which has *NOT* been updated to 1511? If so, I just need the output > > of a call to `cat /proc/self/maps' once for comparison. > > U