Hi folks,
I've updated the version of OpenSSL to 1.0.2d-1. This is a security
bugfix release.
OpenSSL Security Advisory [9 Jul 2015]
===
Alternative chains certificate forgery (CVE-20
I've updated the tcsh package to 6.19.00-2.
This package is ideentical to 6.19.00-1, except for a fix to the default
completion for `ln'. For a description of the problem see
https://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2015-07/msg00037.html
This affects the file /etc/profile.d/complete.tcsh. If you changed i
Ronald Fischer mm.st> writes:
> Using Cygwin 64 on Windows 7:
>
> In a bash or zsh running inside mintty, pressing Control-C has no
> effect. In a bash or zsh running in a Windows Console, it works fine.
>
> This can be verified in two ways:
>
> (1) Using 'trap':
>
> In the shell, we do a
>
On 7/14/2015 5:21 AM, Brent wrote:
On my work computer today, I ran cygwin's setup-x86_64.exe in order to get the
latest and greatest code.
Soon afterwards, Norton Business Suite autoran, and claimed that the new mintty
is malware (to be precise: WS.Malware.2).
This has never happened before:
- Original Message -
> From: "Andrey Repin"
> To: "Andrew Martin" , cygwin@cygwin.com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 8:52:55 PM
> Subject: Re: Cygwin "cp" changes ACLs on files accessed via CIFS
>
> Greetings, Andrew Martin!
>
> > Performing the same operation from Windows Explorer or
The whois package has been updated to the latest upstream release
5.2.9.
The change log can be found here:
https://raw.github.com/rfc1036/whois/master/debian/changelog
More information about whois can be found at
https://github.com/rfc1036/whois
DESCRIPTION:
whois searches for an o
On 7/3/2015 9:09 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/3/2015 6:47 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 2 15:25, Ken Brown wrote:
On 7/2/2015 8:20 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 2 14:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jul 1 22:10, Ken Brown wrote:
I may have spoken too soon. As I repeat the experiment
Hi Ken,
On Jul 14 15:09, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 7/3/2015 9:09 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
> >I think I found the cause of that second SIGSEGV, and, if I'm right, it
> >has nothing to do with Cygwin. I think the problem was that in my
> >testing, I forgot to reset max-specpdl-size and max-lisp-eval-depth
On 07/09/2015 05:30 PM, Michael DePaulo wrote:
> mark06 mentioned this on IRC today and then left the channel about 1 hour
> later:
>
> has anyone ever discussed exit codes above one byte? they are
> valid on modern windows, but cygwin's bash will mess them
POSIX requires that all sizeof(int) b
On 7/14/2015 11:56 AM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
On 7/14/2015 5:21 AM, Brent wrote:
Hi Brenat,
please open a false positive report with Norton
Likely they will recognize the mistake and amend their database
Regards
Marco
As Symantec Endpoint Protection had the same problem
I opened a false po
On 07/08/2015 01:39 PM, Warren Young wrote:
>> - New API sigaltstack, plus definitions for SA_ONSTACK, SS_ONSTACK,
>> SS_DISABLE,
>> MINSIGSTKSZ, SIGSTKSZ.
>
> Since these were entirely missing before, this can’t be tested without
> rebuilding software, right? When rebuilt, existing Cygwin pa
Hi, in the past several months or so, cygwin started giving me ACL
pain in small surges which are gradually growing..
Here's a basic scenario that is slowly, but surely, driving me NUTZ:
$ ln -s /cygdrive/c/tmp /tmp
ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘/tmp’: Operation not permitted
Some other ex
On 06/27/2015 08:52 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> The problem is probably that there are still resources in use which
> didn't get free'd. I'll check next week if I can do anything about it.
> Ideally with a simple testcase than emacs :}
Is libsigsegv an appropriate testcase? There are several o
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Sky Diver wrote:
> $ touch x
>
> $ ls -l x
> -rw-rwxr--+ 1 sky None 0 Jul 15 00:46 x*
>
> $ ln -s x y
> ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘y’: Operation not permitted
I just tried this on a pristine Windows 7 64-bit virtual machine without issue.
You might want to
On 7/14/2015 6:03 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
On 07/08/2015 01:39 PM, Warren Young wrote:
- New API sigaltstack, plus definitions for SA_ONSTACK, SS_ONSTACK, SS_DISABLE,
MINSIGSTKSZ, SIGSTKSZ.
Since these were entirely missing before, this can’t be tested without
rebuilding software, right? Whe
On 7/14/2015 6:18 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
In fact, I'm
a bit surprised that emacs rolls its own protection instead of taking
advantage of libsigsegv - it might be worth suggesting that to upstream
emacs.
Good idea. I'll do that.
Ken
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ
16 matches
Mail list logo
