Greetings, JonY!
> I have just updated the mingw-w64 cross compilers Cygwin 32bit and
> 64bit. Cygwin w32api updates coming soon.
> mingw64-*-headers-4.0.2-1
> mingw64-*-runtime-4.0.2-1
> mingw64-*-winpthreads-4.0.2-1
> mingw64-*-binutils-2.25.0.1.23f238d-1
> mingw64-*-gcc-4.9.2-1
Something isn'
On 5/2/2015 16:47, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Something isn't right with mingw64-x86_64-runtime ?
> It is missing "install" line in setup.ini.
>
> @ mingw64-x86_64-runtime
> sdesc: "MinGW-w64 runtime headers and libraries"
> ldesc: "MinGW-w64 runtime libraries for Win32 64bit target"
> category: Devel
On May 1 14:38, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 05/01/2015 02:12 PM, Marco Atzeri wrote:
> >>> It seems that sys/select.h is no longer implicitly included by some
> >>> other header, I think probably sys/time.h.
>
> POSIX says:
>
> http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/sys_time.h.html#
Hi Rich,
thanks for your help.
On May 1 18:51, Rich Eizenhoefer wrote:
> Hi Corinna,
>
> I spent most of the day yesterday and part of this AM talking with
> console devs and going through the windows codebase to understand the
> changes between Vista and W7 (and now). The regression in
> fun
On May 1 17:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> I downloaded and installed a copy of Windows 10 on a spare system to
> see how Cygwin works. Most of the applications worked similarly to
> what I was testing on my Windows 7 system. However I have run into a
> problem with the screen command.
>
> The
Hello,
Avast Antivirus detected virus Win32:Evo-gen on:
- cygcheck.exe
- cygwin-console-helper.exe
I installed 32-bit version from "setup-x86.exe":
/usr/bin: uname -a
CYGWIN_NT-6.1 amilo 2.0.1(0.287/5/3) 2015-04-30 18:13 i686 Cygwin
/usr/bin: date
Sat May 2 18:39:16 CEST 2015
Zdenek
---
Tat
On Fri, May 1, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Michael Enright wrote:
> When changing from compiler to compiler, even if it be just an OS
> point version upgrade, implicit header inclusions go away all the
> time. As a developer, I just shrug this off as one of the trade-offs
> of choosing to develop in C or C++
On 2 May 2015 at 10:47, Zdeněk Jäger wrote:
> Win32:Evo-gen
Could you supply some more information:
1) Where did you download it. [In case it is a bad mirror]
2) sha256sum of the files it is saying are bad?
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ:
On 2 May 2015 at 07:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On May 1 17:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> I downloaded and installed a copy of Windows 10 on a spare system to
>> see how Cygwin works. Most of the applications worked similarly to
>> what I was testing on my Windows 7 system. However I have
On May 2 11:51, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 2 May 2015 at 07:47, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > On May 1 17:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > Workaround: Set the primary group to the affected files explicitely to
> > an existing group which is in your user token. That would typically be
>
Greetings, Stephen John Smoogen!
>> Either Cygwin sets the group permissions in the POSIX permission
>> attributes to the same value as the user permissions, e.g.
>>
>> rwxrwxr-x
>>
>> then security-sensitive POSIX applications will complain that the
>> permissions are too wide-open.
>>
>> Or, C
Dear cygwin maintainers:
While executing the command "Xwin Server" from Windows 8.1, the server won't
start. Apparently, the executed command is
C:\cygwin64\bin\run.exe --quote /usr/bin/bash.exe -l -c "cd; /usr/bin/startxwin"
The file C:\cygwin64\run.exe.stackdump is produced. Instead I expec
Win32:Evo-gen
1) Where did you download it. [In case it is a bad mirror]
cygwin.mirror.constant.com
2) sha256sum of the files it is saying are bad?
5aa493f4912e00e75d2787fd60e0b19dcce98032e29a16b4e960b103f69ebc41 *cygcheck.exe
d9490c7d4572d46415b704994ac5ab7de24c001d49257ef584c6e32bcda6b4d6
*
On 02/05/15 21:43, Zdeněk Jäger wrote:
2) sha256sum of the files it is saying are bad?
5aa493f4912e00e75d2787fd60e0b19dcce98032e29a16b4e960b103f69ebc41
*cygcheck.exe
d9490c7d4572d46415b704994ac5ab7de24c001d49257ef584c6e32bcda6b4d6
*cygwin-console-helper.exe
It is likely that these are false
14 matches
Mail list logo