Re: screen on 64-bit mangles mintty/buffer

2014-05-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
Nice detective work, really. The goldstar is well deservered :) On May 15 04:00, Shaddy Baddah wrote: > I quickly worked out that the code has a bug for "%i". At some point > the code was changed to push and pop the parameters being passed (0 and > 39 in my eg.). However, the "%i" select/case b

Re: [BUG] /bin/sh crashes with the recent cygwin1.dll on x86/64

2014-05-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 15 09:20, Pavel Fedin wrote: > > > gcc compiler also crashed, but i did not investigate it. All > > problems > > > got fixed when i downgraded cygwin package to version 1.7.28-2. > > > > Please try a recent snapshot from http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > > Tried. /bin/sh runs well, but gcc

Re: Does /etc/profile need to set MANPATH?

2014-05-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 14 18:52, Achim Gratz wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > Yes, this might be better discussed in cygwin-apps. I guess the setting > > of MANPATH is mainly historical. > > I'd be happy to not set MANPATH in /etc/profile if we no longer need it > for the standard installation. I'm wonderi

Re: Default manifest

2014-05-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 15 01:25, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 08:07:26PM -0400, Ken Brown wrote: > >Are we close to a resolution of the problems with default manifests? It > >looks to me like all the pieces are in place, but maybe I've missed > >something: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml

Re: screen on 64-bit mangles mintty/buffer

2014-05-15 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Hi, On 2014-05-15 04:15+1000, Andrew Schulman wrote: I can't understand why the ./conftest.exe differ. Trying to emulate by hand, I cannot reproduce it. But it is now very late here, and I can't debug anymore. I'm hoping that I've provided enough of a lead for someone of authority to decid

Re: screen on 64-bit mangles mintty/buffer

2014-05-15 Thread Shaddy Baddah
Hi Corinna, On 2014-05-15 17:17+1000, Corinna Vinschen wrote: Nice detective work, really. The goldstar is well deservered :) On May 15 04:00, Shaddy Baddah wrote: I quickly worked out that the code has a bug for "%i". At some point the code was changed to push and pop the parameters being

Re: Does /etc/profile need to set MANPATH?

2014-05-15 Thread Chris J. Breisch
Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 14 18:52, Achim Gratz wrote: Corinna Vinschen writes: Yes, this might be better discussed in cygwin-apps. I guess the setting of MANPATH is mainly historical. I'd be happy to not set MANPATH in /etc/profile if we no longer need it for the standard installation.

Re: Does /etc/profile need to set MANPATH?

2014-05-15 Thread Chris J. Breisch
Chris J. Breisch wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 14 18:52, Achim Gratz wrote: Corinna Vinschen writes: Yes, this might be better discussed in cygwin-apps. I guess the setting of MANPATH is mainly historical. I'd be happy to not set MANPATH in /etc/profile if we no longer need it for the

Re: Does /etc/profile need to set MANPATH?

2014-05-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 15 09:17, Chris J. Breisch wrote: > Chris J. Breisch wrote: > >Corinna Vinschen wrote: > >>On May 14 18:52, Achim Gratz wrote: > >>>Corinna Vinschen writes: > Yes, this might be better discussed in cygwin-apps. I guess the setting > of MANPATH is mainly historical. > >>>I'd be happy

Re: screen on 64-bit mangles mintty/buffer

2014-05-15 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On May 15 22:54, Shaddy Baddah wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > > On 2014-05-15 17:17+1000, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > > >Nice detective work, really. The goldstar is well deservered :) > > > >On May 15 04:00, Shaddy Baddah wrote: > >>I quickly worked out that the code has a bug for "%i". At some p

Re: screen on 64-bit mangles mintty/buffer

2014-05-15 Thread Andrew Schulman
> In any case, I've tested the patch below, and it solves the immediate > problem with screen. It probably needs to go upstream too... I'd put > my hand up, but I'm unsure where upstream is exactly. I've uploaded a new test release of screen that incorporates this patch. So we'll see if it fixes t

setup-x86.exe has virus and is blocked by Malware Detectors

2014-05-15 Thread Wes Kaefer
MGW: Heuristic.BehavesLike.Win32.ModifiedUPX.F... -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: Does /etc/profile need to set MANPATH?

2014-05-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 05/15/2014 09:39 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 15 09:17, Chris J. Breisch wrote: Chris J. Breisch wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: On May 14 18:52, Achim Gratz wrote: Corinna Vinschen writes: Yes, this might be better discussed in cygwin-apps. I guess the setting of MANPATH is mainly h

Re: setup-x86.exe has virus and is blocked by Malware Detectors

2014-05-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
The Malware Detectors are wrong. The program was built on Linux so it isn't likely that a Windows virus crept in. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http:

Re: setup-x86.exe has virus and is blocked by Malware Detectors

2014-05-15 Thread Wes Kaefer
I agree, it probably does not have a virus; but it has a virus signature. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: setup-x86.exe has virus and is blocked by Malware Detectors

2014-05-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:25:48PM -0700, Wes Kaefer wrote: >I agree, it probably does not have a virus; but it has a virus signature. So your virus detection is issuing a false positive. You need to fix that. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http:

Re: setup-x86.exe has virus and is blocked by Malware Detectors

2014-05-15 Thread Adam Dinwoodie
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:25:48PM -0700, Wes Kaefer wrote: > I agree, it probably does not have a virus; but it has a virus signature. This is covered in the FAQ at http://cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.setup.virus > Is Cygwin Setup, or one of the packages, infected with a virus? > > Unlikely. Unless y

Re: setup-x86.exe has virus and is blocked by Malware Detectors

2014-05-15 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:36:29PM +0100, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: >On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:25:48PM -0700, Wes Kaefer wrote: >> I agree, it probably does not have a virus; but it has a virus signature. > >This is covered in the FAQ at http://cygwin.com/faq.html#faq.setup.virus Thanks for pointing

Re: setup-x86.exe has virus and is blocked by Malware Detectors

2014-05-15 Thread Robert Pendell
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 08:36:29PM +0100, Adam Dinwoodie wrote: >>On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:25:48PM -0700, Wes Kaefer wrote: >>> I agree, it probably does not have a virus; but it has a virus signature. >> >>This is covered in the FAQ at

where are xfig libraries specified?

2014-05-15 Thread apchar
I want to add some components to the default xfig libraries. I want to put them where they'd ultimately go (/usr/lib/xfig/Libraries/newstuffdir). But I cant find the resource or file that determines the path to the libraries available to xfig. It's not specified in /etc/X11/app-defaults/Fig where I

Re: where are xfig libraries specified?

2014-05-15 Thread Larry Hall (Cygwin)
On 05/15/2014 08:37 PM, apchar wrote: I want to add some components to the default xfig libraries. I want to put them where they'd ultimately go (/usr/lib/xfig/Libraries/newstuffdir). But I cant find the resource or file that determines the path to the libraries available to xfig. It's not specif

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: screen 4.2.1-2 (test release)

2014-05-15 Thread Andrew Schulman
A new version of screen, 4.2.1-2, is available in the Cygwin distribution. This is a new Cygwin-only test release. This release includes a patch that may fix the scrolling corruption bug when screen is used in mintty in 64-bit Cygwin (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2014-01/msg00223.html). If you