Dawid Ferenczy wrote:
>The only difference (or one of few) was in the display size. The old laptop
>has a screen resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels, while the new one has
>1920 x 1080. And I'm using the whole screen for the terminal window. It's
>really strange, but if the terminal window height is gr
Hi John,
It seems xwinclip is still needed, what are the perspectives about this?
Best regards
Franz
Am 30.12.2013 22:56, schrieb Jon TURNEY:
>
> The following packages have been updated in the Cygwin distribution:
>
> *** xorg-server-*1.14.5-1
>
> These packages contain XWin and the other
On 31/12/2013 10:19, Franz Fehringer wrote:
> Hi John,
Firstly, do not send me personal email.
Please read http://cygwin.com/problems.html#personal-email, particularly the
section starting "Shouldn't I just send email to straight to a Cygwin
developer or package maintainer?"
> It seems xwinclip
Hi John,
I will not send you further personal email.
What i really meant was that i read in one of your announcements about
clipboard integration not fully working with the 64bit X server.
The reason why i came up with xwinclip is that i was under the (possibly
wrong) impression that xwinclip reap
On 31/12/2013 14:31, Franz Fehringer wrote:
> I will not send you further personal email.
> What i really meant was that i read in one of your announcements about
> clipboard integration not fully working with the 64bit X server.
> The reason why i came up with xwinclip is that i was under the (pos
Thanks
Am 31.12.2013 16:03, schrieb Jon TURNEY:
> On 31/12/2013 14:31, Franz Fehringer wrote:
>> I will not send you further personal email.
>> What i really meant was that i read in one of your announcements about
>> clipboard integration not fully working with the 64bit X server.
>> The reason w
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:50:29AM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote:
>Dawid Ferenczy wrote:
>>The only difference (or one of few) was in the display size. The old laptop
>>has a screen resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels, while the new one has
>>1920 x 1080. And I'm using the whole screen for the terminal wi
Continued from "a ream of questions."
I pretty much already said I don't know what I'm doing, but that I had some
ideas that might be interesting, for me this is not about being right but being
curious and asking questions, it may surprise you that any viciousness
presented is also welcome as l
Dear Jonathan -- I think it would help greatly,
and perhaps moderate the tone on both sides, if
you could say what you think/thought cygwin is
and what you think/thought it is for. It seems
to me that the bad feelings, or at least sharp
tone, back and forth may be rooted in a
misunderstanding on
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:56:37PM -0800, Jonathan Martin wrote:
>If anything the only thing I am interested in through this entire
>inquiry is cutting through some of this acceptable obfuscation.
Andrew Schulman's advice to you still holds:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2013-12/msg00396.html
Plea
This is more philosophic than technical.
I would like to put together a tutorial that groups unix command line tools
according to complexity so that the easiest and most essential tools are
presented first and the more complex tools are stated later, along with a short
description that would c
My suggestion would be to take a look at some of the
many books that try to introduce Unix and bash to new
users and see how they have approached a good / logical
order of presentation.
cygwin itself is perhaps more directed at experienced
users -- or in any case, it is making no particular
attem
FANTASTIC!
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 5:20 PM, Eliot Moss wrote:
My suggestion would be to take a look at some of the
many books that try to introduce Unix and bash to new
users and see how they have approached a good / logical
order of presentation.
cygwin itself is perhaps more directed
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 01:58:59PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 10:50:29AM +0100, Bengt Larsson wrote:
>>Dawid Ferenczy wrote:
>>>The only difference (or one of few) was in the display size. The old laptop
>>>has a screen resolution of 1366 x 768 pixels, while the new o
These are good guides for learning something about shell scripting,
http://linuxcommand.org/
http://www.howtogeek.com/67469/
This is also good, but more extensive and focused on bash,
http://www.tldp.org/LDP/Bash-Beginners-Guide/html/
One of the nicest things about learning to use cygwin and the
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> This bug should be fixed in today's snapshot (when it shows up):
>
> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
I was seeing the same problem when using mintty (inside ConEmu).
This seems to fix the problem. Thanks.
--
Problem reports: http://
Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>This bug should be fixed in today's snapshot (when it shows up):
>
>http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Works fine now.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 02:58:12PM -0800, Balaji Venkataraman wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> This bug should be fixed in today's snapshot (when it shows up):
>>
>> http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
>
>I was seeing the same problem when using mintty (inside ConEmu
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> I don't understand how you could use mintty within conemu but thanks
> for the confirmation.
Not sure if this is what you meant to ask but all I have is a ConEmu
task like this: "C:\cygwin\bin\mintty.exe C:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe
--login -
On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:00:45PM -0800, Balaji Venkataraman wrote:
>On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>
>> I don't understand how you could use mintty within conemu but thanks
>> for the confirmation.
>
>Not sure if this is what you meant to ask but all I have is a ConEmu
20 matches
Mail list logo
