Re: Binutils objcopy bug (was Re: rebase segfault)

On 1/16/2013 1:35 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: This is a serious bug in objcopy in the current binutils. Given that cygport creates the debug info automatically, we might end up with spuriously broken DLLs in the distro. I checked with objcopy from the older binutils 2.51.53-2, and the problem

Re: rtorrent and recent snapshots - apparent problem with msync()

On Jan 18 16:24, Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 04:10:25PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > >On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 12:18:39AM +0400, Andrey Repin wrote: > >>Greetings, Corinna Vinschen! > >> > I saw that you made another change to this function. Is it possible that >

Re: Binutils objcopy bug (was Re: rebase segfault)

On Jan 19 09:56, marco atzeri wrote: > On 1/16/2013 1:35 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > >This is a serious bug in objcopy in the current binutils. Given that > >cygport creates the debug info automatically, we might end up with > >spuriously broken DLLs in the distro. > > > >I checked with objco

Fwd:

http://vinipoderevecciano.it/admin/about/ht6wn2.php -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple

Re: deadlock with busy waiting on sigfe

On 2013-01-16 AM 11:14, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 08:46:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: Sorry, the backtraces were actually useful because they show that you are apparently running cygwin-snapshot-20130107. Apparently you haven't been watching the discussion about t

Re: deadlock with busy waiting on sigfe

On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 02:23:23PM +0900, jojelino wrote: >On 2013-01-16 AM 11:14, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 08:46:46PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: >> Sorry, the backtraces were actually useful because they show that you >> are apparently running cygwin-snapshot-2013