Re: mkgroup: Could not get group info from samba share

2011-03-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 30 10:53, Christian Gelinek wrote: > Here, I was out of luck as this command did not return anything. I also > tried > > mkgroup -U username -S- -D my_samba_box > > but that reported 'mkgroup (102): [1355] The specified domain either does > not exist or could not be contacted'. Try m

Re: EXTERNAL: Virus that deletes everything under c:/cygwin?

2011-03-30 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Christopher Faylor (Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:35:33 -0400) > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 05:33:05PM +0200, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > >* Dave Korn (Tue, 29 Mar 2011 14:46:13 +0100) > >> On 29/03/2011 10:12, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > >> As for "rm", it already does kind-of have safeguards against this, and > >>

Re: EXTERNAL: Virus that deletes everything under c:/cygwin?

2011-03-30 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Dave Korn (Wed, 30 Mar 2011 00:11:05 +0100) > And I just learnt about the `--preserve-root' option, that I didn't > even know about before. You mean "--preserve-root do not remove `/' (default)" (quoting the man page)? I wonder whether I will receive another "If you're saying that

Re: 1.7.8: undefined reference to __xpg_strerror_r

2011-03-30 Thread Jacky
Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > On Mar 8 18:53, Hughes, Gregory Mark (PSG Consumer Experience) wrote: > > Hi, > > > > After updating to Cygwin 1.7.8-1, I am seeing an unresolved reference to __xpg_strerror_r > > Fixed in the recent snapshots on http://cygwin.com/snapshots/ > > Cor

Re: EXTERNAL: Virus that deletes everything under c:/cygwin?

2011-03-30 Thread Andy Koppe
On 30 March 2011 09:27, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > * Christopher Faylor (Tue, 29 Mar 2011 11:35:33 -0400) >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 05:33:05PM +0200, Thorsten Kampe wrote: >> >As far as I know "-f" is already the default... >> >> If you're saying that "-f" is always active when you type "rm" then, no

Re: 1.7.8: undefined reference to __xpg_strerror_r

2011-03-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 30 08:31, Jacky wrote: > Corinna Vinschen cygwin.com> writes: > > > > > On Mar 8 18:53, Hughes, Gregory Mark (PSG Consumer Experience) wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > After updating to Cygwin 1.7.8-1, I am seeing an unresolved reference to > __xpg_strerror_r > > > > Fixed in the recent

Resetting time via time server doesn't affect cygwin 'date'

2011-03-30 Thread Henry S. Thompson
I'm running 1.7.9-1 on my 64-bit Windows 7 laptop. I recently noticed that my box was 15 seconds adrift from my Linux desktop. After some minor hassles, I was able to use Clock/Date and Time/Internet Time/Change Settings/Update now to sync with a local ntp server, the same one my desktop is using

Re: Resetting time via time server doesn't affect cygwin 'date'

2011-03-30 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Henry S. Thompson (Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:10:37 +0100) > I'm running 1.7.9-1 on my 64-bit Windows 7 laptop. I recently noticed > that my box was 15 seconds adrift from my Linux desktop. After some > minor hassles, I was able to use Clock/Date and Time/Internet > Time/Change Settings/Update now to sy

Re: Resetting time via time server doesn't affect cygwin 'date'

2011-03-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 30 18:16, Thorsten Kampe wrote: > * Henry S. Thompson (Wed, 30 Mar 2011 14:10:37 +0100) > > I'm running 1.7.9-1 on my 64-bit Windows 7 laptop. I recently noticed > > that my box was 15 seconds adrift from my Linux desktop. After some > > minor hassles, I was able to use Clock/Date and Time/I

Re: Resetting time via time server doesn't affect cygwin 'date'

2011-03-30 Thread Henry S. Thompson
Corinna Vinschen writes: > There's an internal counter which is initialized by the first Cygwin > process started in a session. So time chanegs made by a Cygwin process > are seen by other Cygwin processes in the same session, but time changes > outside of Cygwin or outside of the same session ar

Re: Resetting time via time server doesn't affect cygwin 'date'

2011-03-30 Thread Henry S. Thompson
Corinna Vinschen writes: > There's an internal counter which is initialized by the first Cygwin > process started in a session. So time chanegs made by a Cygwin process > are seen by other Cygwin processes in the same session, but time changes > outside of Cygwin or outside of the same session ar

Certain files in Windows/System32 are invisible in Cygwin

2011-03-30 Thread Eric Bracken
This is a strange problem: certain files in the Windows/System32 directory are not visible from Cygwin: Studio(27): ls /cygdrive/c/Windows/System32/nbtstat.exe ls: cannot access /cygdrive/c/Windows/System32/nbtstat.exe: No such file or directory But other ones are: Studio(28): ls /c

Re: Certain files in Windows/System32 are invisible in Cygwin

2011-03-30 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 30 15:47, Eric Bracken wrote: > This is a strange problem: certain files in the Windows/System32 > directory are not visible from Cygwin: > > Studio(27): ls /cygdrive/c/Windows/System32/nbtstat.exe > ls: cannot access /cygdrive/c/Windows/System32/nbtstat.exe: No > such file or dire

Re: Certain files in Windows/System32 are invisible in Cygwin

2011-03-30 Thread Spiro Trikaliotis
Hello, * On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:47:16PM -0400 Eric Bracken wrote: > This is a strange problem: certain files in the Windows/System32 > directory are not visible from Cygwin: [...] > The system in question is Windows 7 64-bit (service pack 1), running [...] > The problematic file (nbtstat.

Re: mkgroup: Could not get group info from samba share

2011-03-30 Thread Christian Gelinek
-Original Message- From: Cygwin On Behalf Of Corinna Vinschen Sent: Wednesday, 30 March 2011 6:51 PM Subject: Re: mkgroup: Could not get group info from samba share > > On Mar 30 10:53, Christian Gelinek wrote: > > Here, I was out of luck as this command did not return anything. I also > >

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated base-files-4.0-6

2011-03-30 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Le 18/03/2011 19:45, David Sastre a écrit : Version 4.0-6 of base-files has been uploaded. Base-files is a set of system configuration and setup files. Hi, would it be possible to change : profile_d () { saved_LC_COLLATE=${LC_COLLATE} LC_COLLATE=C for file in /etc/profile.d/*.$1; do

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated base-files-4.0-6

2011-03-30 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Le 31/03/2011 01:53, Cyrille Lefevre a écrit : Le 18/03/2011 19:45, David Sastre a écrit : Version 4.0-6 of base-files has been uploaded. Base-files is a set of system configuration and setup files. Hi, PS1 *must not* be exported. historically, it is not exported to know if it is a shell

inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells

2011-03-30 Thread Cyrille Lefevre
Hi, /etc/shells is missing some shells : /bin/ash /bin/csh /bin/mksh /usr/bin/ash /usr/bin/csh /usr/bin/mksh and maybe more ? Regards, Cyrille Lefevre -- mailto:cyrille.lefevre-li...@laposte.net -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.

Re: inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells

2011-03-30 Thread Yaakov (Cygwin/X)
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 02:10 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: > /etc/shells is missing some shells : > > /bin/ash > /bin/csh > /bin/mksh > /usr/bin/ash > /usr/bin/csh > /usr/bin/mksh > > and maybe more ? ash is just a copy of dash, and csh is a symlink to tcsh. However, you are certainly correct ab

Fwd: octave updated to 3.4.0-3. Please test

2011-03-30 Thread marco atzeri
same message for the cygwin mailing list, hoping that now I catch all the users. Not the standard announcement message, but the situation was a bit unusual. Marco -- Forwarded message -- From: marco atzeri Date: Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:22 AM Subject: octave updated to 3.4.0-3. Ple

Re: inetutils : missing shells in /etc/shells

2011-03-30 Thread Charles Wilson
On 3/30/2011 10:47 PM, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: > On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 02:10 +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote: >> /etc/shells is missing some shells : >> >> /bin/ash >> /bin/csh >> /bin/mksh >> /usr/bin/ash >> /usr/bin/csh >> /usr/bin/mksh >> >> and maybe more ? > > ash is just a copy of dash, and cs